304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22014797)
1. The chromophobe tumor grading system is the preferred grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
Finley DS; Shuch B; Said JW; Galliano G; Jeffries RA; Afifi AA; Castor B; Magyar C; Sadaat A; Kabbinavar FF; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ
J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2168-74. PubMed ID: 22014797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel tumor grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility and comparison with Fuhrman nuclear grade.
Paner GP; Amin MB; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Moch H; Lyles RH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1233-40. PubMed ID: 20679882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; Martignoni G; Eble JN; Jordan TW
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jun; 31(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 17527087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma should be based on nucleolar prominence.
Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; William Jordan T; Magi-Galluzzi C; Zhou M; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Aug; 35(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21716085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W
Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up.
Lang H; Lindner V; de Fromont M; Molinié V; Letourneux H; Meyer N; Martin M; Jacqmin D
Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 15611969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: the impact of tumor grade on outcome.
Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Sukov WR; Thompson RH; Leibovich BC
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):851-6. PubMed ID: 22367296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: histomorphologic characteristics and evaluation of conventional pathologic prognostic parameters in 145 cases.
Amin MB; Paner GP; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Lyles RH; Moch H
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Dec; 32(12):1822-34. PubMed ID: 18813125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Significance of nuclear grade and tumor size in Korean patients with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a comparison with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
Ku JH; Moon KC; Kwak C; Kim HH
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 19767221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nucleolar grade but not Fuhrman grade is applicable to papillary renal cell carcinoma.
Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; William Jordan T; Delahunt B
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1091-6. PubMed ID: 16931953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic significance of high nuclear grade in patients with pathologic T1a renal cell carcinoma.
Suzuki K; Mizuno R; Mikami S; Tanaka N; Kanao K; Kikuchi E; Miyajima A; Nakagawa K; Oya M
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2012 Sep; 42(9):831-5. PubMed ID: 22811408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Collecting system invasion and Fuhrman grade but not tumor size facilitate prognostic stratification of patients with pT2 renal cell carcinoma.
Brookman-May S; May M; Zigeuner R; Shariat SF; Scherr DS; Chromecki T; Moch H; Wild PJ; Mohamad-Al-Ali B; Cindolo L; Wieland WF; Schips L; De Cobelli O; Rocco B; Santoro L; De Nunzio C; Tubaro A; Coman I; Feciche B; Truss M; Dalpiaz O; Hohenfellner M; Gilfrich C; Wirth MP; Burger M; Pahernik S;
J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2175-81. PubMed ID: 22014800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Percentage of high-grade carcinoma as a prognostic indicator in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Serrano MF; Katz M; Yan Y; Kibel AS; Humphrey PA
Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 18484589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic ability of simplified nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma.
Rioux-Leclercq N; Karakiewicz PI; Trinh QD; Ficarra V; Cindolo L; de la Taille A; Tostain J; Zigeuner R; Mejean A; Patard JJ
Cancer; 2007 Mar; 109(5):868-74. PubMed ID: 17262800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients.
Gudbjartsson T; Hardarson S; Petursdottir V; Thoroddsen A; Magnusson J; Einarsson GV
Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 15964127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Relevance of the clinical-pathological predictive factors in force in chromophobe renal cell cancer].
Pardo P; Rodríguez-Faba O; Palou J; Algaba F; Breda A; Esquena S; Villavicencio H
Actas Urol Esp; 2012 Oct; 36(9):527-31. PubMed ID: 22365081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Fuhrman grading system has no prognostic value in patients with nonsarcomatoid chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
Steffens S; Janssen M; Roos FC; Becker F; Steinestel J; Abbas M; Steinestel K; Wegener G; Siemer S; Thüroff JW; Hofmann R; Stöckle M; Schrader M; Hartmann A; Hasenfus A; Kuczyk MA; Junker K; Schrader AJ;
Hum Pathol; 2014 Dec; 45(12):2411-6. PubMed ID: 25305793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel grading system for clear cell renal cell carcinoma incorporating tumor necrosis.
Delahunt B; McKenney JK; Lohse CM; Leibovich BC; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Cheville JC
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Mar; 37(3):311-22. PubMed ID: 23348209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of Fuhrman and modified Fuhrman grading systems for conventional renal cell carcinoma.
Bektas S; Bahadir B; Kandemir NO; Barut F; Gul AE; Ozdamar SO
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2009 Nov; 25(11):596-600. PubMed ID: 19858038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.
Yoo C; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):486-91; discussion 491. PubMed ID: 18550101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
