151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22014803)
1. Prostate size as a predictor of Gleason score upgrading in patients with low risk prostate cancer.
Davies JD; Aghazadeh MA; Phillips S; Salem S; Chang SS; Clark PE; Cookson MS; Davis R; Herrell SD; Penson DF; Smith JA; Barocas DA
J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2221-7. PubMed ID: 22014803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Small transrectal ultrasound volume predicts clinically significant Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database.
Turley RS; Hamilton RJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Amling CL; Freedland SJ;
J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):523-7; discussion 527-8. PubMed ID: 18076952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Smaller prostate gland size and older age predict Gleason score upgrading.
Gershman B; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Young RH; McDougal WS; Wu CL
Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1033-7. PubMed ID: 22206627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancers diagnosed via multi (> or = 12)-core prostate biopsy.
Hong SK; Han BK; Lee ST; Kim SS; Min KE; Jeong SJ; Jeong H; Byun SS; Lee HJ; Choe G; Lee SE
World J Urol; 2009 Apr; 27(2):271-6. PubMed ID: 19020885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate cancer volume at biopsy predicts clinically significant upgrading.
Dong F; Jones JS; Stephenson AJ; Magi-Galluzzi C; Reuther AM; Klein EA
J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):896-900; discussion 900. PubMed ID: 18207180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association between percentage of tumor involvement and Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer.
Fu Q; Moul JW; Bañez LL; Sun L; Mouraviev V; Xie D; Polascik TJ
Med Oncol; 2012 Dec; 29(5):3339-44. PubMed ID: 22688447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is small prostate volume a predictor of Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy?
Chung MS; Lee SH; Lee DH; Chung BH
Yonsei Med J; 2013 Jul; 54(4):902-6. PubMed ID: 23709424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The association between prostate size and Gleason score upgrading depends on the number of biopsy cores obtained: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital Database.
Turley RS; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Amling CL; Freedland SJ;
BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(9):1074-9. PubMed ID: 18778348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is transperineal prostate biopsy more accurate than transrectal biopsy in determining final Gleason score and clinical risk category? A comparative analysis.
Scott S; Samaratunga H; Chabert C; Breckenridge M; Gianduzzo T
BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():26-30. PubMed ID: 26260531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple Tissue Biomarkers Independently and Additively Predict Prostate Cancer Pathology Outcomes.
Cooperberg MR; Cowan JE; Lindquist KJ; Kobayashi Y; Simko JP; Bengtsson H; Singh K; Ngo V; Avila A; Newcomb LF; Tretriakova M; Lin DW; Stone S; Carroll PR; Paris PL
Eur Urol; 2021 Jan; 79(1):141-149. PubMed ID: 33148472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate Volume is A Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading after Radical Prostatectomy in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Zou Q; Cao J; Chen Z; Wang S; Gu C; Li S; Xiang S
Urol J; 2024 Feb; 21(1):20-28. PubMed ID: 38087971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary Gleason pattern upgrading in contemporary patients with D'Amico low-risk prostate cancer: implications for future biomarkers and imaging modalities.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Abou-Haidar H; Dell'Oglio P; Schiffmann J; Tian Z; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Budäus L; Karakiewicz PI
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):692-699. PubMed ID: 27367469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictors of unfavorable disease after radical prostatectomy in patients at low risk by D'Amico criteria: role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Song SH; Pak S; Park S; Song C; Jeong IG; Choi HJ; Kim JK; Cho KS; Kim CS; Ahn H
J Urol; 2014 Aug; 192(2):402-8. PubMed ID: 24631106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of Pathologic Upgrading or Locally Advanced Disease in Early Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Biopsy Gleason Score and PSA: A Population-Based Study of Modern Patients.
Caster JM; Falchook AD; Hendrix LH; Chen RC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jun; 92(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 25841621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of Gleason score upgrading in a large African-American population.
Vora A; Large T; Aronica J; Haynes S; Harbin A; Marchalik D; Nissim H; Lynch J; Bandi G; McGeagh K; Kowalczyk K; Ghasemian R; Venkatesan K; Verghese M; Hwang J
Int Urol Nephrol; 2013 Oct; 45(5):1257-62. PubMed ID: 23864415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.
Tilki D; Schlenker B; John M; Buchner A; Stanislaus P; Gratzke C; Karl A; Tan GY; Ergün S; Tewari AK; Stief CG; Seitz M; Reich O
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 19837614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proportion of cores with the highest Gleason grade group among positive cores on prostate biopsy: does this affect the probability of upgrading or downgrading?
Yoo S; Suh J; Park J; Cho MC; Son H; Jeong H
Scand J Urol; 2019 Dec; 53(6):372-377. PubMed ID: 31674877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
