BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22014813)

  • 1. Laparoendoscopic single site live donor nephrectomy: single institution report of initial 100 cases.
    Wang GJ; Afaneh C; Aull M; Charlton M; Ramasamy R; Leeser DB; Kapur S; Del Pizzo JJ
    J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2333-7. PubMed ID: 22014813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy and conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: donor and recipient outcomes.
    Afaneh C; Aull MJ; Gimenez E; Wang G; Charlton M; Leeser DB; Kapur S; Del Pizzo JJ
    Urology; 2011 Dec; 78(6):1332-7. PubMed ID: 21996107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of complications of laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy using the modified Clavien grading system.
    Ramasamy R; Afaneh C; Katz M; Chen X; Aull MJ; Leeser DB; Kapur S; Del Pizzo JJ
    J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4):1386-90. PubMed ID: 21855950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison.
    Canes D; Berger A; Aron M; Brandina R; Goldfarb DA; Shoskes D; Desai MM; Gill IS
    Eur Urol; 2010 Jan; 57(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 19664877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoendoscopic single site live donor nephrectomy: initial experience.
    Gimenez E; Leeser DB; Wysock JS; Charlton M; Kapur S; Del Pizzo JJ
    J Urol; 2010 Nov; 184(5):2049-53. PubMed ID: 20850822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) and conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at a single institution.
    Stamatakis L; Mercado MA; Choi JM; Sanchez EJ; Gaber AO; Knight RJ; Mayer WA; Link RE
    BJU Int; 2013 Jul; 112(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 23480679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the open technique and how to reach quality standards: a single-center experience in Thailand.
    Taweemonkongsap T; Nualyong C; Amornvesukit T; Srinualnad S; Jitpraphai S; Premasathian N; Sujijantararat P; Tantiwong A; Soontrapa S
    Transplant Proc; 2011 Dec; 43(10):3593-8. PubMed ID: 22172811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the conventional open approach.
    Brown SL; Biehl TR; Rawlins MC; Hefty TR
    J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):766-9. PubMed ID: 11176463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence.
    Raman JD; Bagrodia A; Cadeddu JA
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1198-204. PubMed ID: 18715694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site and multiport laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: a prospective, nonrandomized study.
    Bazzi WM; Stroup SP; Kopp RP; Cohen SA; Sakamoto K; Derweesh IH
    Urology; 2012 Nov; 80(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 22990064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy: a single-center experience.
    Ganpule AP; Dhawan DR; Kurien A; Sabnis RB; Mishra SK; Muthu V; Desai MR
    Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1238-40. PubMed ID: 19616834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective, case matched comparison of hand assisted laparoscopic and open surgical live donor nephrectomy.
    Wolf JS; Marcovich R; Merion RM; Konnak JW
    J Urol; 2000 Jun; 163(6):1650-3. PubMed ID: 10799153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy - safety in a small-volume transplant center.
    Riley J; Troxel S; Wakefield M; Ross G; Weinstein S
    Clin Transplant; 2010; 24(3):429-32. PubMed ID: 19919610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning Curve for Laparoendoscopic Single-Incision Live Donor Nephrectomy: Implications for Laparoendoscopic Practice and Training.
    Troppmann C; Santhanakrishnan C; Fananapazir G; Troppmann KM; Perez RV
    J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):482-488. PubMed ID: 28068833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility and safety of retroperitoneoscopic laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy: technique and early outcomes.
    Chueh SC; Sankari BR; Chung SD; Jones JS
    BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1879-85. PubMed ID: 21443657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of laparoscopic versus hand-assisted live donor nephrectomy.
    Kokkinos C; Nanidis T; Antcliffe D; Darzi AW; Tekkis P; Papalois V
    Transplantation; 2007 Jan; 83(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 17220789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Open versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a focus on the safety of donors and the need for a donor registry.
    Shokeir AA
    J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1860-6. PubMed ID: 17868736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pfannenstiel laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) vs conventional multiport laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Richstone L; Rais-Bahrami S; Waingankar N; Hillelsohn JH; Andonian S; Schwartz MJ; Kavoussi LR
    BJU Int; 2013 Sep; 112(5):616-22. PubMed ID: 23826907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inguinal oblique incision as an alternative route to extract the kidney during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.
    Wang K; Wan FC; Gao ZL; Wang JM; Zhao JJ; Lin CH; Wang L
    Exp Clin Transplant; 2011 Oct; 9(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 21967257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Pioneer experience in Spain with LSSS nephrectomy in living donor].
    Musquera M; Peri L; Izquierdo L; Campillo P; Ribal MJ; Alcaraz A
    Actas Urol Esp; 2011 Oct; 35(9):559-62. PubMed ID: 21696861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.