231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22016013)
1. The institutional review board: a brief history of attempts to protect human subjects in research.
Buelow PA
Clin Nurse Spec; 2011; 25(6):277-80. PubMed ID: 22016013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Ethics committees in USA--background and development. Responsible conductors of clinical trials required for risk minimization].
Lund LH
Lakartidningen; 2008 Jan 9-15; 105(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 18293746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethics and human experimentation.
Butterworth JF
Anesthesiology; 2011 Apr; 114(4):1001-2; author reply 1002-3. PubMed ID: 21427542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Subjects or objects? Prisoners and human experimentation.
Lerner BH
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(18):1806-7. PubMed ID: 17476006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Human subject protection: overkill?
Kim PJ
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2010; 49(4):317-8. PubMed ID: 20537567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The institutional review board: a critical revisit to the protection of human subjects.
Rutecki GW; Youtsey M; Adelson B
Ethics Med; 2002; 18(3):135-44. PubMed ID: 14700023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
Moreno JD
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Obtaining "informed consent": controversy over radiation tests focuses attention on rules for human subjects.
Wheeler DL
Chron High Educ; 1994 Jan; 40():8-9, 16. PubMed ID: 11658067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Are research ethics bad for our mental health?
Michels R
N Engl J Med; 1999 May; 340(18):1427-30. PubMed ID: 10228197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Conducting ethical research in pediatrics: a brief historical overview and review of pediatric regulations.
Diekema DS
J Pediatr; 2006 Jul; 149(1 Suppl):S3-11. PubMed ID: 16829239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey.
Katz J
IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical and human-rights issues in research on mental disorders that may affect decision-making capacity.
Capron AM
N Engl J Med; 1999 May; 340(18):1430-4. PubMed ID: 10228198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Vulnerable persons in biomedical research: 50 years after the Nuremberg Code.
Dickens BM
J Int Bioethique; 1999; 10(1-2):13-23. PubMed ID: 11806429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploitation and enrichment: the paradox of medical experimentation.
Brazier M
J Med Ethics; 2008 Mar; 34(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 18316459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Beyond Nazi War Crimes Experiments: The Voluntary Consent Requirement of the Nuremberg Code at 70.
Annas GJ
Am J Public Health; 2018 Jan; 108(1):42-46. PubMed ID: 29161060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Research administrator should not serve on institutional review board.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Apr; 17(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 12374181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The historical, ethical, and legal background of human-subjects research.
Rice TW
Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1325-9. PubMed ID: 18811995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical issues in nursing research: access to human subjects.
Scott DW
Top Clin Nurs; 1982 Apr; 4(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 11649725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reform of Clinical Research Regulations, Finally.
Emanuel EJ
N Engl J Med; 2015 Dec; 373(24):2296-9. PubMed ID: 26536071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Do we need another advisory commission on human experimentation?
Katz J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 7730048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
