405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22018363)
1. Comparison of visual performance with an aspheric intraocular lens and a spherical intraocular lens.
Thiagarajan M; McClenaghan R; Anderson DF
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1993-2000. PubMed ID: 22018363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ocular aberrations and visual performance with an aspheric single-piece intraocular lens: contralateral comparative study.
Assaf A; Kotb A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1536-42. PubMed ID: 20692567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual performance and contrast sensitivity after phacoemulsification with implantation of aspheric foldable intraocular lenses.
Nabh R; Ram J; Pandav SS; Gupta A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 19185254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraindividual comparison of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses of same material and platform.
Ohtani S; Miyata K; Samejima T; Honbou M; Oshika T
Ophthalmology; 2009 May; 116(5):896-901. PubMed ID: 19410948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual function after bilateral implantation of a new zonal refractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lens.
Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Sakla HF; García-Lázaro S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Nov; 37(11):2043-52. PubMed ID: 22018366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wavefront aberrations, depth of focus, and contrast sensitivity with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: fellow-eye study.
Nanavaty MA; Spalton DJ; Boyce J; Saha S; Marshall J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Apr; 35(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19304086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual and optical performance of the Akreos Adapt Advanced Optics and Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lenses: Swedish multicenter study.
Johansson B; Sundelin S; Wikberg-Matsson A; Unsbo P; Behndig A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1565-72. PubMed ID: 17720071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual function after monocular implantation of apodized diffractive multifocal or single-piece monofocal intraocular lens Randomized prospective comparison.
Zhao G; Zhang J; Zhou Y; Hu L; Che C; Jiang N
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 36(2):282-5. PubMed ID: 20152611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual quality assessment in patients with orange-tinted blue light-filtering and clear ultraviolet light-filtering intraocular lenses.
Schmack I; Schimpf M; Stolzenberg A; Conrad-Hengerer I; Hengerer FH; Dick HB
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 May; 38(5):823-32. PubMed ID: 22520306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical comparison of the optical performance of aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses.
van Gaalen KW; Koopmans SA; Jansonius NM; Kooijman AC
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 20117703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binocular implantation of the Tecnis Z9000 or AcrySof MA60AC intraocular lens in routine cataract surgery: prospective randomized controlled trial comparing VF-14 scores.
; Allan B
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1559-64. PubMed ID: 17720070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective visual evaluation of apodized diffractive intraocular lenses.
Alfonso JF; Fernández-Vega L; Baamonde MB; Montés-Micó R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1235-43. PubMed ID: 17586380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual performance of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses: intraindividual comparison of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations.
Kasper T; Bühren J; Kohnen T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2022-9. PubMed ID: 17137978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wavefront analysis, contrast sensitivity, and depth of focus after cataract surgery with aspherical intraocular lens implantation.
Santhiago MR; Netto MV; Barreto J; Gomes BA; Mukai A; Guermandi AP; Kara-Junior N
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Mar; 149(3):383-9.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20035922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of optical aberrations and contrast sensitivity between aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses.
Morales EL; Rocha KM; Chalita MR; Nosé W; Avila MP
J Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 27(10):723-8. PubMed ID: 21853963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized intraindividual comparison of the accommodative performance of the bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens in presbyopic eyes.
Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Gala KB
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 150(5):619-627.e1. PubMed ID: 20719298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fellow-eye comparison of 2 aspheric microincision intraocular lenses and effect of asphericity on visual performance.
Nanavaty MA; Spalton DJ; Gala KB
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Apr; 38(4):625-32. PubMed ID: 22342007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses.
Trueb PR; Albach C; Montés-Micó R; Ferrer-Blasco T
Ophthalmology; 2009 May; 116(5):890-5. PubMed ID: 19410947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast sensitivity after implantation of a spherical versus an aspherical intraocular lens in biaxial microincision cataract surgery.
Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Thieme H; Dick HB
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 17321388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity comparison between Tecnis and AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses: A multicenter randomized study.
Bellucci R; Scialdone A; Buratto L; Morselli S; Chierego C; Criscuoli A; Moretti G; Piers P
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Apr; 31(4):712-7. PubMed ID: 15899447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
