293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22018699)
41. Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time.
Massé A; Spérandio M; Cabassud C
Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2405-15. PubMed ID: 16759682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effect of ozonation on sludge reduction in a SBR plant.
Chiavola A; Naso M; Rolle E; Trombetta D
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(9):157-65. PubMed ID: 18025743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Treatment of domestic wastewater in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor followed by moving bed biofilm reactor.
Tawfik A; El-Gohary F; Temmink H
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2010 Feb; 33(2):267-76. PubMed ID: 19404682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Enhanced treatment efficiency of an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR) for cassava stillage with high solids content.
Luo G; Xie L; Zhou Q
J Biosci Bioeng; 2009 Jun; 107(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 19447342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Soluble microbial products (SMPs) in a sequencing batch reactor with novel cake filtration system.
Zhang D; Zhou Y; Bugge TV; Mayanti B; Yang A; Poh LS; Gao X; Majid MBA; Ng WJ
Chemosphere; 2017 Oct; 184():1286-1297. PubMed ID: 28672727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of ozone and HO· induced conversion of effluent organic matter (EfOM) using ozonation and UV/H2O2 treatment.
Audenaert WT; Vandierendonck D; Van Hulle SW; Nopens I
Water Res; 2013 May; 47(7):2387-98. PubMed ID: 23466219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Monitoring organic loading to swimming pools by fluorescence excitation-emission matrix with parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC).
Seredyńska-Sobecka B; Stedmon CA; Boe-Hansen R; Waul CK; Arvin E
Water Res; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2306-14. PubMed ID: 21310459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Spectrometric characterization of the effluent dissolved organic matter from an anammox reactor shows correlation between the EEM signature and anammox growth.
Ruscalleda M; Seredynska-Sobecka B; Ni BJ; Arvin E; Balaguer MD; Colprim J; Smets BF
Chemosphere; 2014 Dec; 117():271-7. PubMed ID: 25113993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effects of effluent organic matter characteristics on the removal of bulk organic matter and selected pharmaceutically active compounds during managed aquifer recharge: Column study.
Maeng SK; Sharma SK; Abel CD; Magic-Knezev A; Song KG; Amy GL
J Contam Hydrol; 2012 Oct; 140-141():139-49. PubMed ID: 23026644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Characterization of organic membrane foulants in a submerged membrane bioreactor with pre-ozonation using three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy.
Liu T; Chen ZL; Yu WZ; You SJ
Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(5):2111-21. PubMed ID: 21269657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Monitoring of COD as an organic indicator in waste water and treated effluent by fluorescence excitation-emission (FEEM) matrix characterization.
Lee S; Ahn KH
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(8):57-63. PubMed ID: 15566187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. SBR performance with an excessive long sludge age.
Huo CX
Environ Technol; 2005 Feb; 26(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 15791801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effects of hydraulic retention time (HRT) and sludge retention time (SRT) on the treatment of nitrobenzene in AMBR/CSTR reactor systems.
Kuscu OS; Sponza DT
Environ Technol; 2007 Mar; 28(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 17432381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effective removal of effluent organic matter (EfOM) from bio-treated coking wastewater by a recyclable aminated hyper-cross-linked polymer.
Yang W; Li X; Pan B; Lv L; Zhang W
Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(13):4730-8. PubMed ID: 23774187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Investigating sorption-driven dissolved organic matter fractionation by multidimensional fluorescence spectroscopy and PARAFAC.
Banaitis MR; Waldrip-Dail H; Diehl MS; Holmes BC; Hunt JF; Lynch RP; Ohno T
J Colloid Interface Sci; 2006 Dec; 304(1):271-6. PubMed ID: 17010987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Reactivity of effluent organic matter (EfOM) with hydroxyl radical as a function of molecular weight.
Dong MM; Mezyk SP; Rosario-Ortiz FL
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Aug; 44(15):5714-20. PubMed ID: 20608709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. AnSBBR applied to a personal care industry wastewater treatment: effects of fill time, volume treated per cycle, and organic load.
Rodrigues JA; Oliveira RP; Ratusznei SM; Zaiat M; Foresti E
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2011 Jan; 163(1):127-42. PubMed ID: 21153450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Two-stage UASB design enables activated-sludge free treatment of easily biodegradable wastewater.
Diamantis V; Aivasidis A
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2010 Feb; 33(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 19418073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Changes in characteristics of soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactors associated with different solid retention times: Relation to membrane fouling.
Kimura K; Naruse T; Watanabe Y
Water Res; 2009 Mar; 43(4):1033-9. PubMed ID: 19059627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Biotreatment of o-nitrobenzaldehyde manufacturing wastewater and changes in activated sludge flocs in a sequencing batch reactor.
Liu C; Ali SW; Guan LB; Yu FB; Li SP; Wong MH
Bioresour Technol; 2012 Jan; 104():228-34. PubMed ID: 22130085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
