These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22018845)

  • 1. [The diagnosis of fetal head engagement: transperineal ultrasound, a new useful tool?].
    Rivaux G; Dedet B; Delarue E; Depret S; Closset E; Deruelle P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Mar; 40(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 22018845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Diagnosis of fetal engagement by transperineal sonography: a preliminary Tunisian study].
    Dimassi K; Ben Amor A; Ben Khedija MA; Derbel M; Ben Aissia N; Triki A; Gara MF
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Jun; 42(6):399-403. PubMed ID: 24411339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
    Tse WT; Chaemsaithong P; Chan WWY; Kwan AHW; Huang J; Appiah K; Chong KC; Poon LC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):335.e1-335.e18. PubMed ID: 31153931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor.
    Sherer DM; Miodovnik M; Bradley KS; Langer O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 11896947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intrapartum assessment of fetal head engagement: comparison between transvaginal digital and transabdominal ultrasound determinations.
    Sherer DM; Abulafia O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 May; 21(5):430-6. PubMed ID: 12768551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The feasibility and accuracy of ultrasound assessment in the labor room.
    Usman S; Wilkinson M; Barton H; Lees CC
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Oct; 32(20):3442-3451. PubMed ID: 29712501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor.
    Eggebø TM; Heien C; Økland I; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of fetal head engagement with transperineal ultrasound: Searching for the cutoff level.
    Desurmont S; Houzé de l'Aulnoit A; Brabant G; Houzé de l'Aulnoit D
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep; 47(7):317-324. PubMed ID: 29793035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor.
    Sherer DM; Miodovnik M; Bradley KS; Langer O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):264-8. PubMed ID: 11896948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor.
    Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; Eggebø TM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 21308837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods in assessing fetal head descent in the first stage of labor.
    Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; Eggebø TM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 21630362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two-center study.
    Eggebø TM; Hassan WA; Salvesen KÅ; Lindtjørn E; Lees CC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 43(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 24105705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal head engagement. A preliminary French prospective study].
    Maticot-Baptista D; Ramanah R; Collin A; Martin A; Maillet R; Riethmuller D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 Oct; 38(6):474-80. PubMed ID: 19481367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors that affect ultrasound-determined labor progress in women undergoing induction of labor.
    Chaemsaithong P; Kwan AHW; Tse WT; Lim WT; Chan WWY; Chong KC; Leung TY; Poon LC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 220(6):592.e1-592.e15. PubMed ID: 30735668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal head engagement.
    Dimassi K; Ben Amor A; Belghith C; Ben Khedija MA; Triki A; Gara MF
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 127(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 24934705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting the difficulty of operative vaginal delivery by ultrasound measurement of fetal head station.
    Kasbaoui S; Séverac F; Aïssi G; Gaudineau A; Lecointre L; Akladios C; Favre R; Langer B; Sananès N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):507.e1-507.e9. PubMed ID: 28153664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Descent of the presenting part assessed with ultrasound.
    Eggebø TM; Hjartardottir H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; 230(3S):S901-S912. PubMed ID: 34461079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery?
    Kalache KD; Dückelmann AM; Michaelis SA; Lange J; Cichon G; Dudenhausen JW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 19224527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring engagement of the fetal head: validity and reproducibility of a new ultrasound technique.
    Dietz HP; Lanzarone V
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 15505817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between fetal head station established using an open magnetic resonance imaging scanner and the angle of progression determined by transperineal ultrasound.
    Bamberg C; Scheuermann S; Slowinski T; Dückelmann AM; Vogt M; Nguyen-Dobinsky TN; Streitparth F; Teichgräber U; Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Kalache KD
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):712-6. PubMed ID: 21308830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.