These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22018845)

  • 21. Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods for assessment of fetal head-symphysis distance in active labor.
    Youssef A; Bellussi F; Montaguti E; Maroni E; Salsi G; Morselli-Labate AM; Paccapelo A; Rizzo N; Pilu G; Ghi T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 43(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 24006290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Preliminary study of fetal head engagement diagnosis by transperineal ultrasound before operative vaginal delivery].
    Raia-Barjat T; Fanget C; Trombert B; Aouar Z; Chêne G; Varlet MN; Seffert P; Chauleur C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Jun; 41(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 22542370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term.
    Eggebø TM; Gjessing LK; Heien C; Smedvig E; Økland I; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 16565994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transperineal ultrasonography for labor management: accuracy and reliability.
    Yuce T; Kalafat E; Koc A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jul; 94(7):760-765. PubMed ID: 25846302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The sonopartogram: a novel method for recording progress of labor by ultrasound.
    Hassan WA; Eggebø T; Ferguson M; Gillett A; Studd J; Pasupathy D; Lees CC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 43(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 24105734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sonographic assessment of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor: how reliable is the transperineal approach?
    Ghi T; Bellussi F; Eggebø T; Tondi F; Pacella G; Salsi G; Cariello L; Piastra A; Youssef A; Pilu G; Rizzo N
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Nov; 28(16):1985-8. PubMed ID: 25316562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound as a predictor of instrumentation difficulty with vacuum-assisted delivery in primiparous women.
    Sainz JA; Borrero C; Fernández-Palacín A; Aquise A; Valdivieso P; Pastor L; Garrido R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015; 28(17):2041-7. PubMed ID: 25327175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fetal head descent assessed by transabdominal ultrasound: a prospective observational study.
    Kamel R; Negm S; Badr I; Kahrs BH; Eggebø TM; Iversen JK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 226(1):112.e1-112.e10. PubMed ID: 34389293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Can ultrasound on admission in active labor predict labor duration and a spontaneous delivery?
    Hjartardóttir H; Lund SH; Benediktsdóttir S; Geirsson RT; Eggebø TM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Sep; 3(5):100383. PubMed ID: 33901721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Utility of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound to predict cases of failure in vacuum extraction attempt and need of cesarean section to complete delivery.
    Sainz JA; Borrero C; Aquise A; Serrano R; Gutiérrez L; Fernández-Palacín A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(8):1348-52. PubMed ID: 26037726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Angle of progression measurements of fetal head at term: a systematic comparison between open magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal ultrasound.
    Bamberg C; Scheuermann S; Fotopoulou C; Slowinski T; Dückelmann AM; Teichgräber U; Streitparth F; Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Kalache KD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 206(2):161.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22177192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sonographic measurement of cervical length and head perineum distance before labor to predict time of delivery.
    Chan YTV; Lau KW; Hui W; Lau CH; Leung WC; Lau WL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):4905-4909. PubMed ID: 33455498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A model to predict vaginal delivery in nulliparous women based on maternal characteristics and intrapartum ultrasound.
    Eggebø TM; Wilhelm-Benartzi C; Hassan WA; Usman S; Salvesen KA; Lees CC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Sep; 213(3):362.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26008180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the learning curves of digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position during labor.
    Rozenberg P; Porcher R; Salomon LJ; Boirot F; Morin C; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 18307213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. What is the most reliable ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal head descent?
    Molina FS; Terra R; Carrillo MP; Puertas A; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 36(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20533441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery.
    Ghi T; Maroni E; Youssef A; Morselli-Labate AM; Paccapelo A; Montaguti E; Rizzo N; Pilu G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 24496823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound.
    Ghi T; Farina A; Pedrazzi A; Rizzo N; Pelusi G; Pilu G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 19202576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Head progression distance in prolonged second stage of labor: relationship with mode of delivery and fetal head station.
    Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z; Spira M; Kedem A; Katorza E; Moran O; Achiron R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 23355510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of selected ultrasonography parameters in the second stage of labor in prediction mode of delivery.
    Ciaciura-Jarno M; Cnota W; Wójtowicz D; Niesłuchowska-Hoxha A; Ruci A; Kierach R; Stępień A; Nowak A; Sodowska P
    Ginekol Pol; 2016; 87(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 27418223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Engagement of fetal head: what have we learnt from ultrasound?].
    Simon EG; Arthuis CJ; Perrotin F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Jun; 42(6):375-7. PubMed ID: 24861438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.