These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22018850)

  • 1. Using subsampling to estimate the strength of handwriting evidence via score-based likelihood ratios.
    Davis LJ; Saunders CP; Hepler A; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Mar; 216(1-3):146-57. PubMed ID: 22018850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Score-based likelihood ratios for handwriting evidence.
    Hepler AB; Saunders CP; Davis LJ; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):129-40. PubMed ID: 22297142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of the likelihood ratio for evaluative and investigative purposes in comparative forensic handwriting examination.
    Taroni F; Marquis R; Schmittbuhl M; Biedermann A; Thiéry A; Bozza S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jan; 214(1-3):189-94. PubMed ID: 21907508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Handwriting evidence evaluation based on the shape of characters: application of multivariate likelihood ratios.
    Marquis R; Bozza S; Schmittbuhl M; Taroni F
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S238-42. PubMed ID: 21198625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using automated comparisons to quantify handwriting individuality.
    Saunders CP; Davis LJ; Buscaglia J
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 May; 56(3):683-9. PubMed ID: 21391999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the discriminability of the handwriting of twins.
    Srihari S; Huang C; Srinivasan H
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Mar; 53(2):430-46. PubMed ID: 18366576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An empirical estimate of the precision of likelihood ratios from a forensic-voice-comparison system.
    Morrison GS; Zhang C; Rose P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):59-65. PubMed ID: 21131149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--modelling within finger variability.
    Egli NM; Champod C; Margot P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):189-95. PubMed ID: 16914278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of signature handwriting evidence via score-based likelihood ratio based on comparative measurement of relevant dynamic features.
    Chen XH; Champod C; Yang X; Shi SP; Luo YW; Wang N; Wang YC; Lu QM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jan; 282():101-110. PubMed ID: 29182954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative assessment of evidential weight for a fingerprint comparison. Part II: a generalisation to take account of the general pattern.
    Neumann C; Evett IW; Skerrett JE; Mateos-Garcia I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jan; 214(1-3):195-9. PubMed ID: 21885220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of forensic findings when alternative explanations have different likelihoods-"Blame-the-brother"-syndrome.
    Nordgaard A; Hedell R; Ansell R
    Sci Justice; 2012 Dec; 52(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 23068773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What do the experts know? Calibration, precision, and the wisdom of crowds among forensic handwriting experts.
    Martire KA; Growns B; Navarro DJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2346-2355. PubMed ID: 29667124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exact computation of the distribution of likelihood ratios with forensic applications.
    Dørum G; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Haned H; Snipen L; Sæbø S; Egeland T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():93-101. PubMed ID: 24528587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision analysis in forensic science.
    Taroni F; Bozza S; Aitken C
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jul; 50(4):894-905. PubMed ID: 16078494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Likelihood-ratio forensic voice comparison using parametric representations of the formant trajectories of diphthongs.
    Morrison GS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2387-97. PubMed ID: 19354412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems.
    Morrison GS
    Sci Justice; 2011 Sep; 51(3):91-8. PubMed ID: 21889105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Issues and opportunities: the application of the numerical likelihood ratio framework to forensic speaker comparison.
    Gold E; Hughes V
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 25002047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of class characteristics in English handwriting of the three main racial groups: Chinese, Malay and Indian in Singapore.
    Cheng N; Lee GK; Yap BS; Lee LT; Tan SK; Tan KP
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jan; 50(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 15831016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interpreting statistical evidence with empirical likelihood functions.
    Zhang Z
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):710-20. PubMed ID: 19650056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Setting bounds for the likelihood ratio when multiple hypotheses are postulated.
    Buckleton JS; Evett IW; Weir BS
    Sci Justice; 1998; 38(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9624810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.