229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22019330)
1. Effect of individual anatomy on resting motor threshold-computed electric field as a measure of cortical excitability.
Danner N; Könönen M; Säisänen L; Laitinen R; Mervaala E; Julkunen P
J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Jan; 203(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 22019330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Within-subject effect of coil-to-cortex distance on cortical electric field threshold and motor evoked potentials in transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Julkunen P; Säisänen L; Danner N; Awiszus F; Könönen M
J Neurosci Methods; 2012; 206(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 22401794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and computed electric field strength reduce stimulator-dependent differences in the motor threshold.
Danner N; Julkunen P; Könönen M; Säisänen L; Nurkkala J; Karhu J
J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Sep; 174(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 18662721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of navigated and non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor cortex mapping, motor threshold and motor evoked potentials.
Julkunen P; Säisänen L; Danner N; Niskanen E; Hukkanen T; Mervaala E; Könönen M
Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):790-5. PubMed ID: 18976714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simple metric for scaling motor threshold based on scalp-cortex distance: application to studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Stokes MG; Chambers CD; Gould IC; Henderson TR; Janko NE; Allen NB; Mattingley JB
J Neurophysiol; 2005 Dec; 94(6):4520-7. PubMed ID: 16135552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors influencing cortical silent period: optimized stimulus location, intensity and muscle contraction.
Säisänen L; Pirinen E; Teitti S; Könönen M; Julkunen P; Määttä S; Karhu J
J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar; 169(1):231-8. PubMed ID: 18243329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex.
Arai N; Okabe S; Furubayashi T; Terao Y; Yuasa K; Ugawa Y
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 116(3):605-13. PubMed ID: 15721074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Altered cortical inhibition in Unverricht-Lundborg type progressive myoclonus epilepsy (EPM1).
Danner N; Julkunen P; Khyuppenen J; Hukkanen T; Könönen M; Säisänen L; Koskenkorva P; Vanninen R; Lehesjoki AE; Kälviäinen R; Mervaala E
Epilepsy Res; 2009 Jul; 85(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 19321308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The cortical motor threshold reflects microstructural properties of cerebral white matter.
Klöppel S; Bäumer T; Kroeger J; Koch MA; Büchel C; Münchau A; Siebner HR
Neuroimage; 2008 May; 40(4):1782-91. PubMed ID: 18342540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of cortical excitability by motor and phosphene thresholds in transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Gerwig M; Kastrup O; Meyer BU; Niehaus L
J Neurol Sci; 2003 Nov; 215(1-2):75-8. PubMed ID: 14568132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Motor potentials evoked by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects.
Säisänen L; Julkunen P; Niskanen E; Danner N; Hukkanen T; Lohioja T; Nurkkala J; Mervaala E; Karhu J; Könönen M
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 25(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 18997630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spike-timing-dependent plasticity induced in resting lower limb cortex persists during subsequent walking.
Jayaram G; Santos L; Stinear JW
Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1153():92-7. PubMed ID: 17459350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distance-adjusted motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Stokes MG; Chambers CD; Gould IC; English T; McNaught E; McDonald O; Mattingley JB
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jul; 118(7):1617-25. PubMed ID: 17524764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of pulse duration in single pulse TMS.
Rothkegel H; Sommer M; Paulus W; Lang N
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Nov; 121(11):1915-21. PubMed ID: 20444645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of the effects of repetitive paired transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortical excitability.
Fitzgerald PB; Fountain S; Hoy K; Maller J; Enticott P; Laycock R; Upton D; Daskalakis ZJ
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Sep; 165(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 17628691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modulation of motor cortex excitability by different levels of whole-hand afferent electrical stimulation.
Golaszewski SM; Bergmann J; Christova M; Kunz AB; Kronbichler M; Rafolt D; Gallasch E; Staffen W; Trinka E; Nardone R
Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Jan; 123(1):193-9. PubMed ID: 21764634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variation of stimulation intensity in transcranial magnetic stimulation with depth.
Trillenberg P; Bremer S; Oung S; Erdmann C; Schweikard A; Richter L
J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Nov; 211(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 23000723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Alterations of motor cortical excitability and anatomy in Unverricht-Lundborg disease.
Danner N; Julkunen P; Hyppönen J; Niskanen E; Säisänen L; Könönen M; Koskenkorva P; Vanninen R; Kälviäinen R; Mervaala E
Mov Disord; 2013 Nov; 28(13):1860-7. PubMed ID: 23925991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of "standard" and "navigated" procedures of TMS coil positioning over motor, premotor and prefrontal targets in patients with chronic pain and depression.
Ahdab R; Ayache SS; Brugières P; Goujon C; Lefaucheur JP
Neurophysiol Clin; 2010 Mar; 40(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 20230933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation can induce bidirectional shifts in motor cortical excitability in awake humans.
Groppa S; Bergmann TO; Siems C; Mölle M; Marshall L; Siebner HR
Neuroscience; 2010 Apr; 166(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 20083166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
