313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22020093)
21. Retinyl palmitate is non-genotoxic in Chinese hamster ovary cells in the dark or after pre-irradiation or simultaneous irradiation with UV light.
Dufour EK; Whitwell J; Nohynek GJ; Kirkland D; Toutain H
Mutat Res; 2009 Jan; 672(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18977457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Strategy for genotoxicity testing--metabolic considerations.
Ku WW; Bigger A; Brambilla G; Glatt H; Gocke E; Guzzie PJ; Hakura A; Honma M; Martus HJ; Obach RS; Roberts S;
Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):59-77. PubMed ID: 17141553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Genotoxicity assessment of two hypergolic energetic propellant compounds.
Reddy G; Song J; Mecchi MS; Johnson MS
Mutat Res; 2010 Jul; 700(1-2):26-31. PubMed ID: 20417306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A transcriptomics-based in vitro assay for predicting chemical genotoxicity in vivo.
Magkoufopoulou C; Claessen SM; Tsamou M; Jennen DG; Kleinjans JC; van Delft JH
Carcinogenesis; 2012 Jul; 33(7):1421-9. PubMed ID: 22623647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Workshop summary: Top concentration for in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity assays; and report from working group on toxicity measures and top concentration for in vitro cytogenetics assays (chromosome aberrations and micronucleus).
Galloway S; Lorge E; Aardema MJ; Eastmond D; Fellows M; Heflich R; Kirkland D; Levy DD; Lynch AM; Marzin D; Morita T; Schuler M; Speit G
Mutat Res; 2011 Aug; 723(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 21255675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Updated recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests.
Kirkland D; Kasper P; Martus HJ; Müller L; van Benthem J; Madia F; Corvi R
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2016 Jan; 795():7-30. PubMed ID: 26774663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative overview of current international strategies and guidelines for genetic toxicology testing for regulatory purposes.
Cimino MC
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2006 Jun; 47(5):362-90. PubMed ID: 16649190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Genetic toxicity assessment: employing the best science for human safety evaluation Part VII: Why not start with a single test: a transformational alternative to genotoxicity hazard and risk assessment.
Ku WW; Aubrecht J; Mauthe RJ; Schiestl RH; Fornace AJ
Toxicol Sci; 2007 Sep; 99(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 17548889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comprehensive retrospective evaluation of existing in vitro chromosomal aberration test data by cytotoxicity index transformation.
Fujita Y; Morita T; Matsumura S; Kawamoto T; Ito Y; Nishiyama N; Honda H
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2016 May; 802():38-49. PubMed ID: 27169375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Summary of in vitro genetic toxicology assay results: expected and unexpected effects of recent study design modifications.
Clarke JJ; Lawlor TE; Madraymootoo W; Pant K; Young RR; Wagner VO; Aardema MJ
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2012 Oct; 53(8):631-5. PubMed ID: 23011908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of high-throughput genotoxicity assays used in profiling the US EPA ToxCast chemicals.
Knight AW; Little S; Houck K; Dix D; Judson R; Richard A; McCarroll N; Akerman G; Yang C; Birrell L; Walmsley RM
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Nov; 55(2):188-99. PubMed ID: 19591892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Genotoxicity studies of 2,6-dinitrotoluene (2,6-DNT).
Suzuki H; Imamura T; Koeda A; Morimoto K; Wakasa Y; Takei Y; Amemiya R; Hatakeyama H; Satoh H; Sato S
J Toxicol Sci; 2011 Aug; 36(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 21804315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Genetic toxicity assessment: employing the best science for human safety evaluation part III: the comet assay as an alternative to in vitro clastogenicity tests for early drug candidate selection.
Witte I; Plappert U; de Wall H; Hartmann A
Toxicol Sci; 2007 May; 97(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 17204584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cycloheximide and disulfoton are positive in the photoclastogencity assay but do not absorb UV irradiation: another example of pseudophotoclastogenicity?
Lynch AM; Robinson SA; Wilcox P; Smith MD; Kleinman M; Jiang K; Rees RW
Mutagenesis; 2008 Mar; 23(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 18227081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Chinese hamster ovary cell assays for mutation and chromosome damage: data from non-carcinogens.
Oshiro Y; Piper CE; Balwierz PS; Soelter SG
J Appl Toxicol; 1991 Jun; 11(3):167-77. PubMed ID: 1918790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Chromosome aberrations in Chinese hamster and human cells: a comparison using compounds with various genotoxicity profiles.
Hilliard C; Hill R; Armstrong M; Fleckenstein C; Crowley J; Freeland E; Duffy D; Galloway SM
Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 616(1-2):103-18. PubMed ID: 17174355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In vitro approaches to develop weight of evidence (WoE) and mode of action (MoA) discussions with positive in vitro genotoxicity results.
Kirkland DJ; Aardema M; Banduhn N; Carmichael P; Fautz R; Meunier JR; Pfuhler S
Mutagenesis; 2007 May; 22(3):161-75. PubMed ID: 17369606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity utilizing a battery of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity tests.
Kim BS; Margolin BH
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 34(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 10618179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Way forward in case of a false positive in vitro genotoxicity result for a cosmetic substance?
Doktorova TY; Ates G; Vinken M; Vanhaecke T; Rogiers V
Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Feb; 28(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 24095862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test.
Clare G
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 817():69-91. PubMed ID: 22147569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
