BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22020610)

  • 1. What occupant kinematics and neuromuscular responses tell us about whiplash injury.
    Siegmund GP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25 Suppl):S175-9. PubMed ID: 22020610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does knowledge of seat design and whiplash injury mechanisms translate to understanding outcomes?
    Ivancic PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25 Suppl):S187-93. PubMed ID: 22020611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Seat properties affecting neck responses in rear crashes: a reason why whiplash has increased.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Sep; 4(3):214-27. PubMed ID: 14522646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of seat properties on occupant dynamics in severe rear crashes.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Dec; 4(4):324-36. PubMed ID: 14630581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of seat foam and geometrical properties on BioRID P3 kinematic response to rear impacts.
    Szabo TJ; Voss DP; Welcher JB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Dec; 4(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 14630580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Loud preimpact tones reduce the cervical multifidus muscle response during rear-end collisions: a potential method for reducing whiplash injuries.
    Mang DW; Siegmund GP; Brown HJ; Goonetilleke SC; Blouin JS
    Spine J; 2015 Jan; 15(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 25110275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of muscle contraction on whiplash kinematics.
    Stemper BD; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():24-9. PubMed ID: 15133930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Seat influences on female neck responses in rear crashes: a reason why women have higher whiplash rates.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Sep; 4(3):228-39. PubMed ID: 14522647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of morphology on cervical injury characteristics.
    Stemper BD; Pintar FA; Rao RD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25 Suppl):S180-6. PubMed ID: 22101749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The startle response during whiplash: a protective or harmful response?
    Mang DW; Siegmund GP; Inglis JT; Blouin JS
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2012 Aug; 113(4):532-40. PubMed ID: 22700800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Kinematic and electromyographic response to whiplash loading in low-velocity whiplash impacts--a review.
    Kumar S; Ferrari R; Narayan Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 May; 20(4):343-56. PubMed ID: 15737441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of collision pulse properties on seven proposed whiplash injury criteria.
    Siegmund GP; Heinrichs BE; Chimich DD; DeMarco AL; Brault JR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Mar; 37(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 15667814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stabilizing effect of precontracted neck musculature in whiplash.
    Stemper BD; Yoganandan N; Cusick JF; Pintar FA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(20):E733-8. PubMed ID: 16985440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Musculotendon and fascicle strains in anterior and posterior neck muscles during whiplash injury.
    Vasavada AN; Brault JR; Siegmund GP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):756-65. PubMed ID: 17414909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. BioRID dummy responses in matched ABTS and conventional seat tests on the IIHS rear sled.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 12(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 21823942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of initial seated position in low speed rear-end impacts: a comparison with the TNO rear impact dummy (TRID) model.
    Venkataramana MP; Hans SA; Bawab SY; Keifer OP; Woodhouse ML; Layson PD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Mar; 6(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 15823879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of anti-whiplash seats during low/moderate speed rear-end collisions.
    Mang DWH; Siegmund GP; Blouin JS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 32027520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of standing or seated pelvis on dummy responses in rear impacts.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():423-31. PubMed ID: 22269526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Kinetics of the head-neck complex in low-speed rear impact.
    Stemper BD; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():245-50. PubMed ID: 12724902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation of whiplash injuries in the upper cervical spine using a detailed neck model.
    Fice JB; Cronin DS
    J Biomech; 2012 Apr; 45(6):1098-102. PubMed ID: 22284991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.