BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22020726)

  • 1. An informed reference prior for between-study heterogeneity in meta-analyses of binary outcomes.
    Pullenayegum EM
    Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(26):3082-94. PubMed ID: 22020726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS.
    Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Burton PR; Abrams KR; Jones DR
    Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2401-28. PubMed ID: 16015676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trying to be precise about vagueness.
    Senn S
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(7):1417-30. PubMed ID: 16906552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Borrowing strength from external trials in a meta-analysis.
    Higgins JP; Whitehead A
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2733-49. PubMed ID: 8981683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian approach to meta-analysis of plant pathology studies.
    Mila AL; Ngugi HK
    Phytopathology; 2011 Jan; 101(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 20822433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses: a simulation study of Bayesian and frequentist implementations of three models.
    Dohoo I; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
    Prev Vet Med; 2007 Sep; 81(1-3):38-55. PubMed ID: 17477995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robust meta-analytic-predictive priors in clinical trials with historical control information.
    Schmidli H; Gsteiger S; Roychoudhury S; O'Hagan A; Spiegelhalter D; Neuenschwander B
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):1023-32. PubMed ID: 25355546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictive distributions for between-study heterogeneity and simple methods for their application in Bayesian meta-analysis.
    Turner RM; Jackson D; Wei Y; Thompson SG; Higgins JP
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(6):984-98. PubMed ID: 25475839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment-effect estimates adjusted for small-study effects via a limit meta-analysis.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter JR; Binder H; Schumacher M
    Biostatistics; 2011 Jan; 12(1):122-42. PubMed ID: 20656692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deflating trees: improving Bayesian branch-length estimates using informed priors.
    Nelson BJ; Andersen JJ; Brown JM
    Syst Biol; 2015 May; 64(3):441-7. PubMed ID: 25595363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How vague is vague? How informative is informative? Reference analysis for Bayesian meta-analysis.
    Ott M; Plummer M; Roos M
    Stat Med; 2021 Sep; 40(20):4505-4521. PubMed ID: 34041768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferences about the between-study variance in meta-analysis with normally distributed outcomes.
    Tian L
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 18383448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey.
    Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
    CMAJ; 2007 Apr; 176(8):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17420491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales.
    Warn DE; Thompson SG; Spiegelhalter DJ
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1601-23. PubMed ID: 12111922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simulation study comparing properties of heterogeneity measures in meta-analyses.
    Mittlböck M; Heinzl H
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4321-33. PubMed ID: 16991104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modelling heterogeneity variances in multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis--are informative priors the better solution?
    Thorlund K; Thabane L; Mills EJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jan; 13():2. PubMed ID: 23311298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The choice of prior distribution for a covariance matrix in multivariate meta-analysis: a simulation study.
    Hurtado Rúa SM; Mazumdar M; Strawderman RL
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(30):4083-104. PubMed ID: 26303671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.