84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22020871)
1. Bodyweight and other correlates of symptom-detected breast cancers in a population offered screening.
Kricker A; Disipio T; Stone J; Goumas C; Armes JE; Gertig DM; Armstrong BK
Cancer Causes Control; 2012 Jan; 23(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 22020871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Why do large breast cancers still present in a population offered screening?
Kricker A; Newman B; Gertig DM; Goumas C; Armes J; Armstrong BK
Int J Cancer; 2008 Dec; 123(12):2907-14. PubMed ID: 18770865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of the Gail model, body mass index and SNPs to predict breast cancer among women with abnormal (BI-RADS 4) mammograms.
McCarthy AM; Keller B; Kontos D; Boghossian L; McGuire E; Bristol M; Chen J; Domchek S; Armstrong K
Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Jan; 17(1):1. PubMed ID: 25567532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of a Risk-Based Approach for Triaging Mammography Examinations During Periods of Reduced Capacity.
Miglioretti DL; Bissell MCS; Kerlikowske K; Buist DSM; Cummings SR; Henderson LM; Onega T; O'Meara ES; Rauscher GH; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Wernli KJ; Lee JM; Lee CI
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Mar; 4(3):e211974. PubMed ID: 33764423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tumor characteristics associated with mammographic detection of breast cancer in the Ontario breast screening program.
Kirsh VA; Chiarelli AM; Edwards SA; O'Malley FP; Shumak RS; Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Jun; 103(12):942-50. PubMed ID: 21540443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characteristics of breast cancers detected by ultrasound screening in women with negative mammograms.
Bae MS; Han W; Koo HR; Cho N; Chang JM; Yi A; Park IA; Noh DY; Choi WS; Moon WK
Cancer Sci; 2011 Oct; 102(10):1862-7. PubMed ID: 21752153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital compared to screen-film mammography: breast cancer prognostic features in an organized screening program.
Prummel MV; Done SJ; Muradali D; Majpruz V; Brown P; Jiang H; Shumak RS; Yaffe MJ; Holloway CM; Chiarelli AM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Sep; 147(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 25108740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcomes of mammography in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2009-2012.
White A; Miller J; Royalty J; Ryerson AB; Benard V; Helsel W; Kammerer W
Cancer Causes Control; 2015 May; 26(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 25809209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk factors for breast cancer in women undergoing mammography.
Reuter KL; Baker SP; Krolikowski FJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 1729780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?
Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy.
Barth RJ; Gibson GR; Carney PA; Mott LA; Becher RD; Poplack SP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):324-9. PubMed ID: 15615996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term prognostic implications of risk factors associated with tumor size: a case study of women regularly attending screening.
Strand F; Humphreys K; Holm J; Eriksson M; Törnberg S; Hall P; Azavedo E; Czene K
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Apr; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 29669579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammography screening methods and diagnostic results.
Thurfjell E
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1995; 395():1-22. PubMed ID: 7839866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of age and breast density on screening mammograms with false-positive findings.
Lehman CD; White E; Peacock S; Drucker MJ; Urban N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1651-5. PubMed ID: 10584815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer screening among low-income or uninsured women: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, July 1995 to March 2002 (United States).
Eheman CR; Benard VB; Blackman D; Lawson HW; Anderson C; Helsel W; Lee NC
Cancer Causes Control; 2006 Feb; 17(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 16411050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of clinical-pathological characteristics between symptomatic and interval breast cancer.
Meshkat B; Prichard RS; Al-Hilli Z; Bass GA; Quinn C; O'Doherty A; Rothwell J; Geraghty J; Evoy D; McDermott EW
Breast; 2015 Jun; 24(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 25771080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors associated with being diagnosed with high severity of breast cancer: a population-based study in Queensland, Australia.
Kou K; Cameron J; Aitken JF; Youl P; Turrell G; Chambers S; Dunn J; Pyke C; Baade PD
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Dec; 184(3):937-950. PubMed ID: 32926317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
