259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22021511)
21. Patient-size-dependent radiation dose optimisation technique for abdominal CT examinations.
Ngaile JE; Msaki P; Kazema R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 21357583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comprehensive method for calculating patient effective dose and other dosimetric quantities from CT DICOM images.
Tsalafoutas IA; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jul; 199(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 22733904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Early first-trimester fetal radiation dose estimation in 16-MDCT without and with automated tube current modulation.
Jaffe TA; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva GI; Nguyen G; Hurwitz LM; Nelson RC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):860-4. PubMed ID: 18356429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Preliminary studies for a CBCT imaging protocol for offline organ motion analysis: registration software validation and CTDI measurements.
Falco MD; Fontanarosa D; Miceli R; Carosi A; Santoni R; D'Andrea M
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 20363613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Estimation of the peak entrance surface air kerma for patients undergoing computed tomography-guided procedures.
Avilés Lucas P; Dance DR; Castellano IA; Vañó E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):317-20. PubMed ID: 15933129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A preliminary study of the novel application of normoxic polymer gel dosimeters for the measurement of CTDI on diagnostic x-ray CT scanners.
Hill B; Venning AJ; Baldock C
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1589-97. PubMed ID: 16013718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Paediatric CT exposures: comparison between CTDI vol and SSDE methods using measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.
Figueira C; Di Maria S; Baptista M; Mendes M; Madeira P; Vaz P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):210-5. PubMed ID: 25883302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Polymer gel dosimetry on a multislice computed tomography scanner: effect of changing parameters on CTDI.
Hill B; Venning AJ; Baldock C
Phys Med; 2008 Sep; 24(3):149-58. PubMed ID: 18289906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pseudohelical scan for the dose profile measurements of 160-mm-wide cone-beam MDCT.
Lin PJ; Herrnsdorf L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):897-902. PubMed ID: 20308488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dose reduction to anterior surfaces with organ-based tube-current modulation: evaluation of performance in a phantom study.
Duan X; Wang J; Christner JA; Leng S; Grant KL; McCollough CH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 21862813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Towards establishment of the national reference dose levels from computed tomography examinations in Tanzania.
Ngaile JE; Msaki P; Kazema R
J Radiol Prot; 2006 Jun; 26(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 16738417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dosimetry methods for multi-detector computed tomography.
Gancheva M; Dyakov I; Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Taseva D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):190-3. PubMed ID: 25889607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dose uniformity analysis among ten 16-slice same-model CT scanners.
Erdi YE
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(1):154-6. PubMed ID: 22261787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Automatic computed tomography patient dose calculation using DICOM header metadata.
Jahnen A; Kohler S; Hermen J; Tack D; Back C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):317-20. PubMed ID: 21831868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm imaging system.
Zhang J; Weir V; Fajardo L; Lin J; Hsiung H; Ritenour ER
J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 19923687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. CT dose: how to measure, how to reduce.
McCollough CH
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):508-17. PubMed ID: 18849683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of difference in cross-sectional dose profile in a CTDI phantom on X-ray CT dose estimation: a Monte Carlo study.
Haba T; Koyama S; Ida Y
Radiol Phys Technol; 2014 Jan; 7(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 24272457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cloud-Based CT Dose Monitoring using the DICOM-Structured Report: Fully Automated Analysis in Regard to National Diagnostic Reference Levels.
Boos J; Meineke A; Rubbert C; Heusch P; Lanzman RS; Aissa J; Antoch G; Kröpil P
Rofo; 2016 Mar; 188(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 26632871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Female breast, lung, and pelvic organ radiation from dose-reduced 64-MDCT thoracic examination protocols: a phantom study.
Litmanovich D; Tack D; Lin PJ; Boiselle PM; Raptopoulos V; Bankier AA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Oct; 197(4):929-34. PubMed ID: 21940581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dose is not always what it seems: where very misleading values can result from volume CT dose index and dose length product.
Seibert JA; Boone JM; Wootton-Gorges SL; Lamba R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Mar; 11(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 24589395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
