These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22022492)

  • 1. Suffering makes you egoist: acute pain increases acceptance rates and reduces fairness during a bilateral ultimatum game.
    Mancini A; Betti V; Panasiti MS; Pavone EF; Aglioti SM
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e26008. PubMed ID: 22022492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is it all about the self? The effect of self-control depletion on ultimatum game proposers.
    Halali E; Bereby-Meyer Y; Ockenfels A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():240. PubMed ID: 23781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
    Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. You are excusable! Neural correlates of economic neediness on empathic concern and fairness perception.
    Wang A; Zhu L; Lyu D; Cai D; Ma Q; Jin J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 22(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 34374029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolution of fairness in the not quite ultimatum game.
    Ichinose G; Sayama H
    Sci Rep; 2014 May; 4():5104. PubMed ID: 24869922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
    Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game.
    Rand DG; Tarnita CE; Ohtsuki H; Nowak MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Feb; 110(7):2581-6. PubMed ID: 23341593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game.
    Kaltwasser L; Hildebrandt A; Wilhelm O; Sommer W
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27261490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fairness norms and theory of mind in an ultimatum game: judgments, offers, and decisions in school-aged children.
    Castelli I; Massaro D; Bicchieri C; Chavez A; Marchetti A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e105024. PubMed ID: 25118863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study.
    Ma Q; Hu Y; Jiang S; Meng L
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():77. PubMed ID: 25805967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Five-year-olds understand fair as equal in a mini-ultimatum game.
    Wittig M; Jensen K; Tomasello M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):324-37. PubMed ID: 23917161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fair and unfair punishers coexist in the Ultimatum Game.
    Brañas-Garza P; Espín AM; Exadaktylos F; Herrmann B
    Sci Rep; 2014 Aug; 4():6025. PubMed ID: 25113502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity.
    Yamagishi T; Horita Y; Mifune N; Hashimoto H; Li Y; Shinada M; Miura A; Inukai K; Takagishi H; Simunovic D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Dec; 109(50):20364-8. PubMed ID: 23188801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short- and long-run goals in ultimatum bargaining: impatience predicts spite-based behavior.
    Espín AM; Exadaktylos F; Herrmann B; Brañas-Garza P
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():214. PubMed ID: 26347625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shall I Show My Emotions? The Effects of Facial Expressions in the Ultimatum Game.
    Ferracci S; Giuliani F; Brancucci A; Pietroni D
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2021 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 35049619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proposers' Economic Status Affects Behavioral and Neural Responses to Unfairness.
    Zheng Y; Cheng X; Xu J; Zheng L; Li L; Yang G; Guo X
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():847. PubMed ID: 28611705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generosity in dictator game and social value orientation predicted the type of costly punishment in ultimatum game.
    Li J; Cheng N; Hou W
    Psych J; 2021 Aug; 10(4):625-634. PubMed ID: 33594817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Influence of Counterfactual Comparison on Fairness in Gain-Loss Contexts.
    Li Q; Wang C; Taxer J; Yang Z; Zheng Y; Liu X
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():683. PubMed ID: 28536542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game.
    Nowak MA; Page KM; Sigmund K
    Science; 2000 Sep; 289(5485):1773-5. PubMed ID: 10976075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.