These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22022895)

  • 1. Distraction and facilitation--two faces of the same coin?
    Wetzel N; Widmann A; Schröger E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):664-74. PubMed ID: 22022895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The informational constraints of behavioral distraction by unexpected sounds: the role of event information.
    Ljungberg JK; Parmentier FB; Leiva A; Vega N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1461-8. PubMed ID: 22563629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Behavioral distraction by auditory novelty is not only about novelty: the role of the distracter's informational value.
    Parmentier FB; Elsley JV; Ljungberg JK
    Cognition; 2010 Jun; 115(3):504-11. PubMed ID: 20338553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Behavioral distraction by auditory deviance is mediated by the sound's informational value. Evidence from an auditory discrimination task.
    Li B; Parmentier FB; Zhang M
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(4):260-8. PubMed ID: 23628699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distraction by emotional sounds: Disentangling arousal benefits and orienting costs.
    Max C; Widmann A; Kotz SA; Schröger E; Wetzel N
    Emotion; 2015 Aug; 15(4):428-37. PubMed ID: 26053245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task.
    Parmentier FB; Elford G; Escera C; Andrés P; San Miguel I
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):408-32. PubMed ID: 17445791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: the role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing.
    Parmentier FB
    Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):345-62. PubMed ID: 19007926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The semantic aftermath of distraction by deviant sounds: Crosstalk interference is mediated by the predictability of semantic congruency.
    Parmentier FB; Kefauver M
    Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 1626():247-57. PubMed ID: 25641044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction.
    Corral MJ; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1535-9. PubMed ID: 18797312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of the short-term learned significance of task-irrelevant sounds on involuntary attention in children and adults.
    Wetzel N
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Oct; 98(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 26093029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sadness increases distraction by auditory deviant stimuli.
    Pacheco-Unguetti AP; Parmentier FB
    Emotion; 2014 Feb; 14(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 24098923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive control of involuntary distraction by deviant sounds.
    Parmentier FB; Hebrero M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1635-41. PubMed ID: 23565784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of age on involuntary capture of attention by irrelevant sounds: a test of the frontal hypothesis of aging.
    Andrés P; Parmentier FB; Escera C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2564-8. PubMed ID: 16797613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The dissociation between the P3a event-related potential and behavioral distraction.
    Wetzel N; Schröger E; Widmann A
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Sep; 50(9):920-30. PubMed ID: 23763292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sound affects the speed of visual processing.
    Keetels M; Vroomen J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):699-708. PubMed ID: 20854000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A dual contribution to the involuntary semantic processing of unexpected spoken words.
    Parmentier FB; Turner J; Perez L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 23339333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
    SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.