262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2202317)
1. Biofilm hydrogel dressing: a clinical evaluation in the treatment of pressure sores.
Darkovich SL; Brown-Etris M; Spencer M
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1990; 29():47-60. PubMed ID: 2202317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a new synthetic polymer sheet wound dressing.
Motta G; Dunham L; Dye T; Mentz J; O'Connell-Gifford E; Smith E
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Oct; 45(10):41, 44-6, 48-49. PubMed ID: 10687651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of wound dressings on full-thickness wounds in micropigs.
Gokoo C; Burhop K
Decubitus; 1993 Sep; 6(5):42-3, 46, 48 passim. PubMed ID: 8286020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers.
Seeley J; Jensen JL; Hutcherson J
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):39-44, 46-7. PubMed ID: 10655861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Moist environment for healing: matching the dressing to the wound.
Alvarez O
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1988; 21():64-83. PubMed ID: 3074811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Care of pressure sores: a controlled study of the use of a hydrocolloid dressing compared with wet saline gauze compresses.
Alm A; Hornmark AM; Fall PA; Linder L; Bergstrand B; Ehrnebo M; Madsen SM; Setterberg G
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1989; 149():1-10. PubMed ID: 2694713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.
Colwell JC; Foreman MD; Trotter JP
Decubitus; 1993 Jul; 6(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 8297488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multi-center evaluation of a new wound dressing.
Barr JE
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1993; 39(9):60-4, 66-7. PubMed ID: 8136005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
Chang KW; Alsagoff S; Ong KT; Sim PH
Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hydrogels and hydrocolloids: an objective product comparison.
Sprung P; Hou Z; Ladin DA
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1998 Jan; 44(1):36-42, 44, 46 passim. PubMed ID: 9510821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Local applications to wounds--II. Dressings for wounds and ulcers.
Drug Ther Bull; 1991 Dec; 29(25):97-100. PubMed ID: 1790759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Managing sacral pressure ulcers with hydrocolloid dressings: results of a controlled, clinical study.
Day A; Dombranski S; Farkas C; Foster C; Godin J; Moody M; Morrison M; Tamer C
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Mar; 41(2):52-4, 56, 58 passim. PubMed ID: 7598778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing clinical efficacy of a hydrocolloid/alginate dressing on full-thickness pressure ulcers.
Barr JE; Day AL; Weaver VA; Taler GM
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Apr; 41(3):28-30, 32, 34-6 passim. PubMed ID: 7546113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new hydrogel wound dressing for the treatment of open wounds. Gel-Syte wound care dressing evaluation.
Fowler E; Papen JC
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1991; 37():39-45. PubMed ID: 1764158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of hydrocolloid dressings for neurosurgical wounds.
Fujimoto Y; Shimooka N; Ohnishi Y; Yoshimine T
Surg Neurol; 2008 Aug; 70(2):217-20; discussion 220. PubMed ID: 18262632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved pressure sore healing with hydrocolloid dressings.
Gorse GJ; Messner RL
Arch Dermatol; 1987 Jun; 123(6):766-71. PubMed ID: 3555355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of two dressings in the management of chronic wounds.
Thomas S; Banks V; Bale S; Fear-Price M; Hagelstein S; Harding KG; Orpin J; Thomas N
J Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 6(8):383-6. PubMed ID: 9341430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A polyurethane dressing is beneficial for split-thickness skin-graft donor wound healing.
Akita S; Akino K; Imaizumi T; Tanaka K; Anraku K; Yano H; Hirano A
Burns; 2006 Jun; 32(4):447-51. PubMed ID: 16621321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.
Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
