These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22023341)

  • 1. Estimating risk from underpowered, but statistically significant, studies: was APPROVe on TARGET?
    La Caze A; Duffull S
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2011 Dec; 36(6):637-41. PubMed ID: 22023341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Handling drop-out in longitudinal clinical trials: a comparison of the LOCF and MMRM approaches.
    Lane P
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(2):93-106. PubMed ID: 17351897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the Gould-Shih procedure for sample size re-estimation.
    Waksman JA
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 17133631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biased estimators of quantitative trait locus heritability and location in interval mapping.
    Bogdan M; Doerge RW
    Heredity (Edinb); 2005 Dec; 95(6):476-84. PubMed ID: 16189542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Missing data mechanisms in a dose-finding adaptive trial.
    Liu K; Entsuah R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):329-37. PubMed ID: 22251177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple comparisons distortions of parameter estimates.
    Jeffries NO
    Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):500-4. PubMed ID: 16971376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery.
    Gurusamy KS; Gluud C; Nikolova D; Davidson BR
    Br J Surg; 2009 Apr; 96(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 19283747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test for the consistency of noninferiority from multiple clinical trials.
    Yan X; Wang MC; Su X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 17365223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The reassessment of trial perspectives from interim data--a critical view.
    Bauer P; Koenig F
    Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 16220517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistically significant meta-analyses of clinical trials have modest credibility and inflated effects.
    Pereira TV; Ioannidis JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1060-9. PubMed ID: 21454050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings.
    Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 17715249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power.
    Borm GF; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):47.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18620841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses.
    Palmer TM; Thompson JR; Tobin MD; Sheehan NA; Burton PR
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1161-8. PubMed ID: 18463132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Power and sample size when multiple endpoints are considered.
    Senn S; Bretz F
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 17674404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standard versus adaptive monitoring procedures: A commentary.
    Fleming TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3305-12; discussion 3313-4, 3326-47. PubMed ID: 16850447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An efficient method for accommodating potentially underpowered primary endpoints.
    Li J; Mehrotra DV
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5377-91. PubMed ID: 18759248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical and clinical significance: alternative methods for understanding the importance of research findings.
    Glaros AG
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2004; 50(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 15481525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variance estimation in clinical studies with interim sample size re-estimation.
    Miller F
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 16011681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Study design: statistical and methodologic considerations.
    Rubenfeld GD
    Respir Care; 1995 Sep; 40(9):980-6. PubMed ID: 10152244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What you see depends on where you're looking and how you look at it: publication bias and outcome reporting bias.
    Howland RH
    J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 2011 Aug; 49(8):13-5. PubMed ID: 21766733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.