These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22023346)

  • 21. Speech perception in noise: exploring the effect of linguistic context in children with and without auditory processing disorder.
    Lagacé J; Jutras B; Giguère C; Gagné JP
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):385-95. PubMed ID: 21599614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Word discrimination in the presence of competing speech with children.
    Chermak GD; Zielonko B
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(5):188-92. PubMed ID: 856780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of speech transmission in open public spaces affected by combined noises.
    Lee PJ; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 21786892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in children with specific language impairment.
    Clarke EM; Ahmmed A; Parker D; Adams C
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 16518143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Danish hearing in noise test.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 21319937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Language deficits in dyslexic children: speech perception, phonology, and morphology.
    Joanisse MF; Manis FR; Keating P; Seidenberg MS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2000 Sep; 77(1):30-60. PubMed ID: 10964458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Severity of hyperacusis predicts individual differences in speech perception in Williams Syndrome.
    Elsabbagh M; Cohen H; Cohen M; Rosen S; Karmiloff-Smith A
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2011 Jun; 55(6):563-71. PubMed ID: 21557785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Children's recognition of American English consonants in noise.
    Nishi K; Lewis DE; Hoover BM; Choi S; Stelmachowicz PG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3177-88. PubMed ID: 21117766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Human phoneme recognition depending on speech-intrinsic variability.
    Meyer BT; Jürgens T; Wesker T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3126-41. PubMed ID: 21110608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: a longitudinal study.
    Tsao FM; Liu HM; Kuhl PK
    Child Dev; 2004; 75(4):1067-84. PubMed ID: 15260865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perception of speech features by French-speaking children with cochlear implants.
    Bouton S; Serniclaes W; Bertoncini J; Colé P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):139-53. PubMed ID: 22199195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Early language development of children at familial risk of dyslexia: speech perception and production.
    Gerrits E; de Bree E
    J Commun Disord; 2009; 42(3):180-94. PubMed ID: 19100994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Acceptable range of speech level in noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons.
    Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1411-9. PubMed ID: 21895082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
    Yang W; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
    Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perception of final fricative voicing: native and nonnative listeners' use of vowel duration.
    Broersma M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1636-44. PubMed ID: 20329862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On cross-language consonant identification in second language noise.
    Marchegiani L; Fafoutis X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Oct; 138(4):2206-9. PubMed ID: 26520302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Speech perception in children with specific reading difficulties (dyslexia).
    Adlard A; Hazan V
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 Feb; 51(1):153-77. PubMed ID: 9532966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is children's listening effort in background noise influenced by the speaker's voice quality?
    Sahlén B; Haake M; von Lochow H; Holm L; Kastberg T; Brännström KJ; Lyberg-Åhlander V
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Jul; 43(2):47-55. PubMed ID: 28511620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.