BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22023486)

  • 1. Acceptable noise level with Danish, Swedish, and non-semantic speech materials.
    Brännström KJ; Lantz J; Nielsen LH; Olsen SØ
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Mar; 51(3):146-56. PubMed ID: 22023486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.
    Olsen SØ; Lantz J; Nielsen LH; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):678-88. PubMed ID: 22731922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acceptable noise level: repeatability with Danish and non-semantic speech materials for adults with normal hearing.
    Olsen SØ; Nielsen LH; Lantz J; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):557-63. PubMed ID: 22537032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The equivalence of acceptable noise level (ANL) with English, Mandarin, and non-semantic speech: a study across the U.S. and Taiwan.
    Ho HC; Wu YH; Hsiao SH; Stangl E; Lentz EJ; Bentler RA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 23153252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of listening condition on background noise acceptance for young adults with normal hearing.
    Gordon-Hickey S; Moore RE; Estis JM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 55(5):1356-72. PubMed ID: 22411277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acceptance of noise with intelligible, reversed, and unfamiliar primary discourse.
    Gordon-Hickey S; Moore RE
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Dec; 17(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 18840706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contribution of high-frequency information to the acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Plyler PN; Madix SG; Thelin JW; Johnston KW
    Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18056883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Chisolm TH; Blasco GP; Shinnick LJ; Ketter KJ; Krause JC
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 19390441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Freyaldenhoven MC; Plyler PN; Thelin JW; Hedrick MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 17675593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of reverberation on acceptable noise level measurements in younger and older adults.
    Adams EM; Gordon-Hickey S; Moore RE; Morlas H
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Nov; 49(11):832-8. PubMed ID: 20936995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Type of Speech Material Affects Acceptable Noise Level Test Outcome.
    Koch X; Dingemanse G; Goedegebure A; Janse E
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():186. PubMed ID: 26952145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The acceptable noise level: the effect of repeated measurements.
    Brännström KJ; Holm L; Kastberg T; Olsen SØ
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 24003981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acceptance of background noise, working memory capacity, and auditory evoked potentials in subjects with normal hearing.
    Brännström KJ; Zunic E; Borovac A; Ibertsson T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):542-52. PubMed ID: 22992261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of extending high-frequency bandwidth on the acceptable noise level (ANL) of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Johnson E; Ricketts T; Hornsby B
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(6):353-62. PubMed ID: 19925343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of repeated measurements and working memory on the most comfortable level in the ANL test.
    Brännström KJ; Olsen SØ; Holm L; Kastberg T; Ibertsson T
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Nov; 53(11):787-95. PubMed ID: 25156233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining perceived sound quality in a simulated hearing aid using the international speech test signal.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Moats P
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):533-5. PubMed ID: 21325947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: a multi-center study.
    Jansen S; Luts H; Wagener KC; Kollmeier B; Del Rio M; Dauman R; James C; Fraysse B; Vormès E; Frachet B; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Mar; 51(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 22122354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.