155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22024177)
1. The use of cephalometric landmarks with 3-dimensional volumetric computer modeling to position an auricular implant surgical template: a clinical report.
Kolodney H; Swedenburg G; Taylor SS; Carron JD; Schlakman BN
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 22024177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fabrication of a surgical template for orbital implant placement: a case report.
Zhang X; Chen SL; Zhang JM; Chen JL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):826-30. PubMed ID: 20657881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of new soft tissue software in orthognathic surgery planning.
Marchetti C; Bianchi A; Muyldermans L; Di Martino M; Lancellotti L; Sarti A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 40(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21030211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Planning implant positions for an auricular prosthesis with digital data.
Reitemeier B; Schöne C; Schreiber S; Stockmann F; Ullmann K; Eckelt U
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 22304747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional computer-aided surgical simulation for maxillofacial surgery.
Xia JJ; Gateno J; Teichgraeber JF
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2005 Mar; 13(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 15820428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computer technology and medical imaging for immediate loading of implants in the pterygomaxillary region.
Balshi SF; Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Jun; 26(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 16836166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prosthesis-guided implant restoration of an auricular defect using computed tomography and 3-dimensional photographic imaging technologies: a clinical report.
Wang S; Leng X; Zheng Y; Zhang D; Wu G
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 25444284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing implant guide used in flapless surgery for auricular prosthesis.
Bai S; Bi Y; Dong Y; Feng Z; Zhao Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 70(6):1338-41. PubMed ID: 22494513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology.
van der Zel JM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of a morphing technique for predicting the position and size of an artificial ear in hemifacial microsomia patients.
Coward TJ; Richards R; Scott BJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):451-7. PubMed ID: 25191888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of traditional cephalometric landmarks as seen in three-dimensional analysis in maxillary expansion treatments.
Lagravère MO; Gordon JM; Guedes IH; Flores-Mir C; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1047-56. PubMed ID: 19852593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computed tomography-based planning and three-dimensional modeling for craniofacial implant placement: a technical note.
Kurtulmus H; Cotert HS; Guneri P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):943-6. PubMed ID: 19865636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guidance for placement of dental implants: case report.
Wong NY; Huffer-Charchut H; Sarment DP
Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 17563502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of three methods to evaluate the position of an artificial ear on the deficient side of the face from a three-dimensional surface scan of patients with hemifacial microsomia.
Coward TJ; Watson RM; Richards R; Scott BJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 22371838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional modeling for modern diagnosis and planning in maxillofacial surgery.
Ayoub AF; Wray D; Moos KF; Siebert P; Jin J; Niblett TB; Urquhart C; Mowforth R
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 9456625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Algorithm for planning a double-jaw orthognathic surgery using a computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) protocol. Part 2: three-dimensional cephalometry.
Xia JJ; Gateno J; Teichgraeber JF; Yuan P; Li J; Chen KC; Jajoo A; Nicol M; Alfi DM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 44(12):1441-50. PubMed ID: 26573563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-assisted design of orbital implants.
Zhang X; Chen S; Huang Y; Chang S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):132-7. PubMed ID: 17340907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of the reliability and repeatability of landmarks using 3-D cephalometric software.
Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco AA; Crincoli V; Debernardi CL; Bracco P
Cranio; 2012 Oct; 30(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23156966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mirror imaging and preshaped titanium plates in the treatment of unilateral malar and zygomatic arch fractures.
Feng F; Wang H; Guan X; Tian W; Jing W; Long J; Tang W; Liu L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Aug; 112(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 21216634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cone beam computed tomography-assisted treatment planning concepts.
Ganz SD
Dent Clin North Am; 2011 Jul; 55(3):515-36, viii. PubMed ID: 21726687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
