These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22024866)

  • 1. The perfect peer.
    Nat Chem; 2011 Oct; 3(11):831. PubMed ID: 22024866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Editorial peer review in biomedical publishing: an overview.
    Napolitani Cheyne F
    Rom J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 13(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 15229782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review. Suggesting or excluding reviewers can help get your paper published.
    Grimm D
    Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5743):1974. PubMed ID: 16179438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review. Editorial.
    Kenyon G; Youngs R
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Dec; 123(12):1299-300. PubMed ID: 19958561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An editor's checklist.
    Guillery RW
    Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5892):1039. PubMed ID: 18719263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suggesting reviewers affects outcome?
    Ackerley DF
    Science; 2005 Nov; 310(5750):971-2. PubMed ID: 16284161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suggesting reviewers affects outcome?
    Wray KB
    Science; 2005 Nov; 310(5750):971-2. PubMed ID: 16299870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Translation of the scientific method... Peer review.
    Scarfe WC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 20176497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Painful publishing.
    Raff M; Johnson A; Walter P
    Science; 2008 Jul; 321(5885):36. PubMed ID: 18599755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Too close to call.
    Curfman GD; Drazen JM
    N Engl J Med; 2001 Sep; 345(11):832. PubMed ID: 11556307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Tidsskriftet, peer review and medical publishing].
    Bjørheim J; Frich JC; Gjersvik P; Jacobsen G; Swensen E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 16397649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Where to now for health-related journal peer review?
    Lipworth W; Kerridge I
    J Law Med; 2011 Jun; 18(4):724-7. PubMed ID: 21774269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Publishing in a peer-reviewed journal.
    Downer M
    Community Dent Health; 2003 Mar; 20(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 12688596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The matter of standards. III. The editorial process.
    Wilkins AS
    Bioessays; 2008 Nov; 30(11-12):1037-9. PubMed ID: 18937297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific publishing. PNAS nixes special privileges for (most) papers.
    Kean S
    Science; 2009 Sep; 325(5947):1486-7. PubMed ID: 19762615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stem cells. ...and how the problems eluded peer reviewers and editors.
    Couzin J
    Science; 2006 Jan; 311(5757):23-4. PubMed ID: 16400115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neutralizing the impact factor culture.
    Notkins AL
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):191. PubMed ID: 18845731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subliminal editorial conundra confounding publication of multicenter trials.
    Frohlich ED; Pepine CJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2004 Nov; 94(10):1268-9. PubMed ID: 15541242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Communication skills for surgeons and their teams: publishing medical research.
    Pietrzak WS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1306-12. PubMed ID: 19816246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. To publish or not to publish? How we answer that question.
    Baravarian B
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2010 Jun; 3(3):107. PubMed ID: 20508008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.