These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22025287)

  • 1. Review of ecological-based risk management approaches used at five Army Superfund sites.
    Poucher SL; Tracey GA; Johnson MS; Haines LB
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Apr; 8(2):246-61. PubMed ID: 22025287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of multicriteria decision analysis to support weight of evidence evaluation.
    Linkov I; Welle P; Loney D; Tkachuk A; Canis L; Kim JB; Bridges T
    Risk Anal; 2011 Aug; 31(8):1211-25. PubMed ID: 21371061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Translating ecological risk to ecosystem service loss.
    Munns WR; Helm RC; Adams WJ; Clements WH; Cramer MA; Curry M; DiPinto LM; Johns DM; Seiler R; Williams LL; Young D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):500-14. PubMed ID: 19545189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CERCLA-linked environmental impact and benefit analysis: Evaluating remedial alternatives for the Portland Harbor Superfund Site, Portland, Oregon, USA.
    McNally AD; Fitzpatrick AG; Mirchandani S; Salmon M; Edwards DA
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Jan; 14(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 29068521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stakeholder value-linked sustainability assessment: Evaluating remedial alternatives for the Portland Harbor Superfund Site, Portland, Oregon, USA.
    Apitz SE; Fitzpatrick AG; McNally A; Harrison D; Coughlin C; Edwards DA
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Jan; 14(1):43-62. PubMed ID: 29058827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selection of remedial alternatives for mine sites: a multicriteria decision analysis approach.
    Betrie GD; Sadiq R; Morin KA; Tesfamariam S
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Apr; 119():36-46. PubMed ID: 23454412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk-based economic decision analysis of remediation options at a PCE-contaminated site.
    Lemming G; Friis-Hansen P; Bjerg PL
    J Environ Manage; 2010 May; 91(5):1169-82. PubMed ID: 20117877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A decision support tool to prioritize risk management options for contaminated sites.
    Sorvari J; Seppälä J
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Mar; 408(8):1786-99. PubMed ID: 20138649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A socio-ecological adaptive approach to contaminated mega-site management: from 'control and correct' to 'coping with change'.
    Schirmer M; Lyon K; Armstrong JE; Farrell KN
    J Contam Hydrol; 2012 Jan; 127(1-4):101-9. PubMed ID: 21890232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risks to children from exposure to lead in air during remedial or removal activities at Superfund sites: a case study of the RSR lead smelter Superfund site.
    Khoury GA; Diamond GL
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 13(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 12595884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of factors affecting stakeholder risk perception of contaminated sediment disposal in Oslo harbor.
    Sparrevik M; Ellen GJ; Duijn M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 20809566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating habitat value to inform contaminant remediation options: case study.
    Efroymson RA; Peterson MJ; Giffen NR; Ryon MG; Smith JG; Hargrove WW; Roy WK; Welsh CJ; Druckenbrod DL; Quarles HD
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Sep; 88(4):1452-70. PubMed ID: 18022757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From optimization to adaptation: shifting paradigms in environmental management and their application to remedial decisions.
    Linkov I; Satterstrom FK; Kiker GA; Bridges TS; Benjamin SL; Belluck DA
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 16640324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The integration of ecological risk assessment and structured decision making into watershed management.
    Ohlson DW; Serveiss VB
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jan; 3(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 17283600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ecological effects of diffuse mixed pollution are site-specific and require higher-tier risk assessment to improve site management decisions: a discussion paper.
    Leo P; Eijsackers HJ; Koelmans AA; Vijver MG
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Dec; 406(3):503-17. PubMed ID: 18757078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Valentin J;
    Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of the role of risk-based decision-making in a former manufactured gas plant site remediation.
    Vyas VM; Gochfeld MG; Georgopoulos PG; Lioy PJ; Sussman NR
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Feb; 56(2):225-35. PubMed ID: 16570377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A perspective on LCA application in site remediation services: critical review of challenges.
    Morais SA; Delerue-Matos C
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Mar; 175(1-3):12-22. PubMed ID: 19910112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk assessment, remedial decisions and the challenge to protect public health: the perchlorate case study.
    Baier-Anderson C
    Anal Chim Acta; 2006 May; 567(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 17723373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.