180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22025998)
1. Survival of two post systems--five-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
Schmitter M; Hamadi K; Rammelsberg P
Quintessence Int; 2011; 42(10):843-50. PubMed ID: 22025998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cast metal vs. glass fibre posts: a randomized controlled trial with up to 3 years of follow up.
Sarkis-Onofre R; Jacinto RC; Boscato N; Cenci MS; Pereira-Cenci T
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):582-7. PubMed ID: 24530920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rigid versus flexible dentine-like endodontic posts--clinical testing of a biomechanical concept: seven-year results of a randomized controlled clinical pilot trial on endodontically treated abutment teeth with severe hard tissue loss.
Sterzenbach G; Franke A; Naumann M
J Endod; 2012 Dec; 38(12):1557-63. PubMed ID: 23146637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber reinforced posts and cast gold post and cores cemented with three cements.
Torres-Sánchez C; Montoya-Salazar V; Córdoba P; Vélez C; Guzmán-Duran A; Gutierrez-Pérez JL; Torres-Lagares D
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23929374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance under static and fatigue loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with carbon fiber posts, glass fiber posts, and an experimental dentin post system: an in vitro study.
Ambica K; Mahendran K; Talwar S; Verma M; Padmini G; Periasamy R
J Endod; 2013 Jan; 39(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 23228265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber posts of different lengths.
Franco EB; Lins do Valle A; Pompéia Fraga de Almeida AL; Rubo JH; Pereira JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 24161260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 10-year survival evaluation for glass-fiber-supported postendodontic restoration: a prospective observational clinical study.
Naumann M; Koelpin M; Beuer F; Meyer-Lueckel H
J Endod; 2012 Apr; 38(4):432-5. PubMed ID: 22414824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of clinical baseline findings on the survival of 2 post systems: a randomized clinical trial.
Schmitter M; Rammelsberg P; Gabbert O; Ohlmann B
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 17455439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the survival of fibre posts cemented with two different composite resin systems.
Mehta SB; Millar BJ
Br Dent J; 2008 Dec; 205(11):E23. PubMed ID: 19029918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Placement of fiber prefabricated or custom made posts affects the 3-year survival of endodontically treated premolars.
Cagidiaco MC; García-Godoy F; Vichi A; Grandini S; Goracci C; Ferrari M
Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 18686771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture resistance of roots prosthetically restored with intra-radicular posts of different lengths.
Cecchin D; Farina AP; Guerreiro CA; Carlini-Júnior B
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Feb; 37(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 19968767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance of incisor teeth restored using fibre-reinforced posts and threaded metal posts: effect of post length, location, pretreatment and cementation of the final restoration.
Schmitter M; Lippenberger S; Rues S; Gilde H; Rammelsberg P
Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 20518938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Four-year Survival of Endodontically Treated Premolars Restored with Fiber Posts.
Juloski J; Fadda GM; Monticelli F; Fajó-Pascual M; Goracci C; Ferrari M
J Dent Res; 2014 Jul; 93(7 Suppl):52S-58S. PubMed ID: 24646637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with 3 different adhesive systems and 4 different fiber-reinforced posts.
Başaran EG; Ayna E; Halifeoğlu M
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):239-51. PubMed ID: 22475467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of acid conditioning of root canal dentin on the retention of adhesively luted glass fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts.
Albashaireh ZS; Ghazal M; Kern M
Am J Dent; 2009 Dec; 22(6):376-80. PubMed ID: 20178216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Removal time of fiber posts versus titanium posts.
Frazer RQ; Kovarik RE; Chance KB; Mitchell RJ
Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 18686770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term survival of endodontically treated, maxillary anterior teeth restored with either tapered or parallel-sided glass-fiber posts and full-ceramic crown coverage.
Signore A; Benedicenti S; Kaitsas V; Barone M; Angiero F; Ravera G
J Dent; 2009 Feb; 37(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 19091452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fiber post placement with core build-up materials or resin cements-an evaluation of different adhesive approaches.
Sterzenbach G; Karajouli G; Naumann M; Peroz I; Bitter K
Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Sep; 70(5):368-76. PubMed ID: 21815838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of resin cement system and root region on the push-out bond strength of a translucent fiber post.
Calixto LR; Bandéca MC; Clavijo V; Andrade MF; Vaz LG; Campos EA
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 21942240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of post type and restorative techniques on the strain and fracture resistance of flared incisor roots.
Silva GR; Santos-Filho PC; Simamoto-Júnior PC; Martins LR; Mota AS; Soares CJ
Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 21915521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
