170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22026069)
1. [Current classification of malignant tumours in gynecological oncology--part I].
Sehnal B; Driák D; Kmonícková E; Dvorská M; Hosová M; Citterbart K; Halaska M; Kolarík D
Ceska Gynekol; 2011 Sep; 76(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 22026069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Current classification of malignant tumours in gynecological oncology--part II].
Sehnal B; Driák D; Kmonícková E; Dvorská M; Hosová M; Citterbart K; Halaska M; Kolarík D
Ceska Gynekol; 2011 Oct; 76(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 22132636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. History of the FIGO cancer staging system.
Odicino F; Pecorelli S; Zigliani L; Creasman WT
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 May; 101(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 18199437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The reasons of changes in revised staging for carcinoma of the vulva].
Sehnal B; Kmoníčková E; Maxová K; Koutníková H; Driák D; Neumannová H; Bolehovská P; Sláma J
Klin Onkol; 2013; 26(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 24107153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. TNM classification of gynaecological malignant tumours, eighth edition: changes between the seventh and eighth editions.
Tokunaga H; Shimada M; Ishikawa M; Yaegashi N
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2019 Apr; 49(4):311-320. PubMed ID: 30668753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The current staging for uterine body malignancies and its importance for clinical practice].
Sehnal B; Benková K; Kmoníčková E; Driák D; Spůrková Z; Maxová K; Sláma J
Cesk Patol; 2014 Apr; 50(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 24758507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The changes in FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri.
Sehnal B; Sláma J; Kmoníčková E; Dubová O; Zikán M
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(3):216-221. PubMed ID: 31324113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Revised FIGO staging systems for gynecologic malignancies--2009 update].
Zalewski K; Doniec J; Baranowski W; Bidziński M
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):778-82. PubMed ID: 21117307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Which staging system to use for gynaecological cancers: a survey with recommendations for practice in the UK.
McCluggage WG; Hirschowitz L; Ganesan R; Kehoe S; Nordin A
J Clin Pathol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):768-70. PubMed ID: 20696685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Current FIGO Staging for Carcinoma of the Cervix Uteri and Treatment of Particular Stages.
Sehnal B; Kmoníčková E; Sláma J; Tomancová V; Zikán M
Klin Onkol; 2019; 32(3):224-231. PubMed ID: 31216857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Issues and inconsistencies in the revised gynecologic staging systems.
Cole L; Stoler MH
Semin Diagn Pathol; 2012 Aug; 29(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 23062423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Malignant gynecologic neoplasms in the Czech Republic 1986-1995].
Bouda J; Bouda J
Ceska Gynekol; 2000 Jan; 65(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 10750302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [TNM classification of gynecological tumors].
Kato T; Hasumi K
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1998 Apr; 25(5):765-73. PubMed ID: 9571979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Proteomics and its importance for gynecological oncology].
Lacheta J; Cibula D; Freitag P; Zivný J
Ceska Gynekol; 2004 Sep; 69(5):384-7. PubMed ID: 15587895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of laparoscopy in staging of different gynaecological cancers.
Tse KY; Ngan HY
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Aug; 29(6):884-95. PubMed ID: 25819676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Validity of the oncological cytodiagnostics and colposcopy examination versus biopsy in cervical carcinoma prevention].
Kobilková J; Dohnalová A; Jirásek JE; Strunová M; Janoušek M; Horáček J
Ceska Gynekol; 2012 Aug; 77(4):364-70. PubMed ID: 23094780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings.
Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I
Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Principles of Cancer Staging for Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Gospodarowicz M; Brierley J; O'Sullivan B
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Aug; 29(6):767-75. PubMed ID: 26231930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of the new FIGO 2009 staging classification for vulvar cancer on prognosis and stage distribution.
Tabbaa ZM; Gonzalez J; Sznurkowski JJ; Weaver AL; Mariani A; Cliby WA
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):147-52. PubMed ID: 22704951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Prognostic factors of mesenchymal and mixed tumors of uterus].
Spacek J; Laco J; Petera J; Jílek P; Krepinská E; Rezác A; Stipl S
Ceska Gynekol; 2009 Aug; 74(4):292-7. PubMed ID: 20564985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
