BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2202672)

  • 1. Tissue reaction involving an intraoral skin graft and CP titanium abutments: a clinical report.
    Mitchell DL; Synnott SA; VanDercreek JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 2202672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant failure due to titanium hypersensitivity/allergy?--Report of a case.
    du Preez LA; Bütow KW; Swart TJ
    SADJ; 2007 Feb; 62(1):22, 24-5. PubMed ID: 17427726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reconstruction of the shallow vestibule edentulous mandible with simultaneous split thickness skin graft vestibuloplasty and mandibular endosseous implants for implant-supported overdentures.
    Cillo JE; Finn R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 19138614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A 4-year prospective study to assess peri-implant hard and soft tissues adjacent to titanium versus gold-alloy abutments in cemented single implant crowns.
    Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(4):250-6. PubMed ID: 16827738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Considerations in placement of implants through existing split-thickness skin graft vestibuloplasty: a case report.
    Bedrossian E; Gongloff RK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(4):401-4. PubMed ID: 2094659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Titanium allergy in dental implant patients: a clinical study on 1500 consecutive patients.
    Sicilia A; Cuesta S; Coma G; Arregui I; Guisasola C; Ruiz E; Maestro A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):823-35. PubMed ID: 18705814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Titanium allergy associated with dental implant failure.
    Pigatto PD; Guzzi G; Brambilla L; Sforza C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Aug; 20(8):857. PubMed ID: 19604283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The rationale for soft-tissue grafting and vestibuloplasty in association with endosseous implants: a literature review.
    Hoelscher DC; Simons AM
    J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(4):282-91. PubMed ID: 7643437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
    Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suspected association of an allergic reaction with titanium dental implants: a clinical report.
    Egusa H; Ko N; Shimazu T; Yatani H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Nov; 100(5):344-7. PubMed ID: 18992567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical experiences with laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous mandible: a 10-year follow-up study.
    Ortorp A; Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):198-209. PubMed ID: 17100745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The clinical assessment of a ceramic-coated transmucosal dental implant collar.
    Barclay CW; Last KS; Williams R
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(5):466-72. PubMed ID: 9108748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The rationale for soft-tissue grafting and vestibuloplasty in association with endosseous implants: a literature review.
    Hoelscher DC; Simons AM
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 1996 Mar; 78(3):56-64. PubMed ID: 9520665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct replacement of failed CP titanium implants with larger-diameter, HA-coated Ti-6Al-4V implants: report of five cases.
    Evian CI; Cutler SA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(6):736-43. PubMed ID: 8530177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On electric current creation in patients treated with osseointegrated dental bridges.
    Nilner K; Lekholm U
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1985; 28():85-92. PubMed ID: 3904066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Experimental comparison of tissue response to various endosseous implants].
    Miotti A; Passi P; Musajo F
    Dent Cadmos; 1984 Nov; 52(11):99, 101, 103-4. PubMed ID: 6399267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments.
    Gulizio MP; Agar JR; Kelly JR; Taylor TD
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15733129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials.
    Welander M; Abrahamsson I; Berglundh T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jul; 19(7):635-41. PubMed ID: 18492075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Histologic analysis of clinically retrieved titanium microimplants placed in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation.
    Jensen OT; Sennerby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):513-21. PubMed ID: 9714958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of the coupling of titanium implants and dissimilar metal abutments on osteoblast differentiation in vitro.
    Taylor JC; Anderson GI; Sutow EJ; Driscoll CF; Mackey DC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):785-97. PubMed ID: 10612915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.