302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2202808)
1. The effects of scaling titanium implant surfaces with metal and plastic instruments on cell attachment.
Dmytryk JJ; Fox SC; Moriarty JD
J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):491-6. PubMed ID: 2202808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study.
Fox SC; Moriarty JD; Kusy RP
J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):485-90. PubMed ID: 2202807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cell Attachment Following Instrumentation with Titanium and Plastic Instruments, Diode Laser, and Titanium Brush on Titanium, Titanium-Zirconium, and Zirconia Surfaces.
Lang MS; Cerutis DR; Miyamoto T; Nunn ME
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 27447145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of scaling procedures on epithelial cell growth on titanium surfaces.
Kuempel DR; Johnson GK; Zaharias RS; Keller JC
J Periodontol; 1995 Mar; 66(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 7776169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The treatment of uncoated and titanium nitride-coated abutments with different instruments.
Mengel R; Meer C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 15101595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [In vitro effects on rough implant surfaces of different instrumentations used in the surgical therapy of peri-implantitis].
Espedito Di Lauro A; Morgese F; Squillace A; Ramaglia L
Minerva Stomatol; 2003; 52(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 12686908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments.
Mengel R; Buns CE; Mengel C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9509785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations.
Ramaglia L; di Lauro AE; Morgese F; Squillace A
Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16569965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the safety and efficiency of novel metallic ultrasonic scaler tip on titanium surfaces.
Baek SH; Shon WJ; Bae KS; Kum KY; Lee WC; Park YS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1269-74. PubMed ID: 22093039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An investigation of the effect of scaling-induced surface roughness on bacterial adhesion in common fixed dental restorative materials.
Checketts MR; Turkyilmaz I; Asar NV
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1265-70. PubMed ID: 24831748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces.
Augthun M; Tinschert J; Huber A
J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):857-64. PubMed ID: 9736367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of hygiene instrumentation on titanium abutments: a scanning electron microscopy study.
Homiak AW; Cook PA; DeBoer J
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Mar; 67(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 1324308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of plastic-covered ultrasonic scalers on titanium implant surfaces.
Mann M; Parmar D; Walmsley AD; Lea SC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 21488970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in vitro evaluation of zirconia surface roughness caused by different scaling methods.
Vigolo P; Motterle M
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 20416411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of ultrasonic scaler tips and toothbrush on titanium disc surfaces evaluated with confocal microscopy.
Park JB; Kim N; Ko Y
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22976659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is galvanic corrosion between titanium alloy and stainless steel spinal implants a clinical concern?
Serhan H; Slivka M; Albert T; Kwak SD
Spine J; 2004; 4(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 15246296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The surface characteristics produced by various oral hygiene instruments and materials on titanium implant abutments.
Rapley JW; Swan RH; Hallmon WW; Mills MP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2202669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implant surface alterations from a nonmetallic ultrasonic tip.
Bailey GM; Gardner JS; Day MH; Kovanda BJ
J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr; 1998; 46(3):69-73. PubMed ID: 10597152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maintenance of implants: an in vitro study of titanium implant surface modifications subsequent to the application of different prophylaxis procedures.
Matarasso S; Quaremba G; Coraggio F; Vaia E; Cafiero C; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Mar; 7(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 9002824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The maintenance of inserted titanium implants: in-vitro evaluation of exposed surfaces cleaned with three different instruments.
Bertoldi C; Lusuardi D; Battarra F; Sassatelli P; Spinato S; Zaffe D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jan; 28(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 26744027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
