117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22028267)
1. [Meta-analysis].
D'Arrigo G; Provenzano F; Torino C; Zoccali C; Tripepi G
G Ital Nefrol; 2011; 28(5):531-6. PubMed ID: 22028267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Publication bias in trials other than RCTs].
Timmer A
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 21530909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Significance of Cochrane collaboration for evidence-based medicine].
Gøtzsche PC
Lakartidningen; 2000 Jun; 97(26-27):3180-2. PubMed ID: 10925578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry.
Biljana M; Jelena M; Branislav J; Milorad R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():323-8. PubMed ID: 10724898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A primer in meta-analysis for the plastic surgeon.
Temple C
Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 64(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 20224326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comments on article by Mitte and associates: "A meta-analytic review of the efficacy of drug treatment in generalized anxiety disorder".
Magalhães PV
J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2006 Apr; 26(2):220-1; author reply 221. PubMed ID: 16633161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [A guide to critical reading of clinical articles].
Eliasson M
Lakartidningen; 2000 Jun; 97(26-27):3178-9. PubMed ID: 10925577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events.
Bradburn MJ; Deeks JJ; Berlin JA; Russell Localio A
Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):53-77. PubMed ID: 16596572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Meta-analyses to reveal insufficient mega-trials].
Graudal NA; Galløe AM
Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Jun; 160(24):3574. PubMed ID: 9641048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of re-randomized data in meta-analysis.
Hozo I; Djulbegovic B; Clark O; Lyman GH
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 May; 5():17. PubMed ID: 15882470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Meta-analysis of clinical trials].
Pignon JP; Poynard T
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1991; 15(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 2044886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Sources of bias in clinical trials.
Pandis N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):595-6. PubMed ID: 21967950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Prospectively identified trials could be used for comparison with meta-analyses.
Langhorne P
BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):471. PubMed ID: 9492689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power.
Borm GF; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):47.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18620841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.
Rücker G; Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G
Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):351-68. PubMed ID: 21374698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-analysis of randomized control trials applied to cancer therapy.
Chalmers TC; Lau J
Important Adv Oncol; 1992; ():235-41. PubMed ID: 1582675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey.
Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
CMAJ; 2007 Apr; 176(8):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17420491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Selective reporting of positive outcomes in randomised trials--secondary publication.. A comparison of protocols with published reports].
Hróbjartsson A; Chan AW; Haahr MT; Gøtzsche PC; Altman DG
Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Aug; 167(34):3189-91. PubMed ID: 16117920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Growing pains of cochranology].
Karle H; Hansen NE
Ugeskr Laeger; 1999 May; 161(18):2689-91. PubMed ID: 10434795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Meta-analyses of chronic disease trials with competing causes of death may yield biased odds ratios.
Koller MT; Stijnen T; Steyerberg EW; Lubsen J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 18313561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
