These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Evidence for a new late positive ERP component in an attended novelty oddball task. McDonald CG; Gabbay FH; Rietschel JC; Duncan CC Psychophysiology; 2010 Sep; 47(5):809-13. PubMed ID: 20230498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation on long-latency event-related potentials. Kovacs N; Balas I; Kellenyi L; Janszky J; Feldmann A; Llumiguano C; Doczi TP; Ajtay Z; Nagy F Parkinsonism Relat Disord; 2008 Aug; 14(6):476-80. PubMed ID: 18313971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. With long intervals, inter-stimulus interval is the critical determinant of the human P300 amplitude. Sambeth A; Maes JH; Brankack J Neurosci Lett; 2004 Apr; 359(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 15050684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Age-related differences in performance and stimulus processing in dual task situation. Hahn M; Wild-Wall N; Falkenstein M Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 1414():66-76. PubMed ID: 21871612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can subitizing survive the attentional blink? An ERP study. Xu X; Liu C Neurosci Lett; 2008 Aug; 440(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 18556118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of self-evaluation on the P300 event-related potential. Alexander JE; Alexander RG; Crowson B; Machan K; Hall CA; Lockwood D; Godinez D Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Apr; 100(2):409-20. PubMed ID: 15974352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual-task interference during initial learning of a new motor task results from competition for the same brain areas. Rémy F; Wenderoth N; Lipkens K; Swinnen SP Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2517-27. PubMed ID: 20434467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information. Sawaki R; Katayama J Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov; 117(11):2532-9. PubMed ID: 17005448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs. Itier RJ; Taylor MJ Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1518-32. PubMed ID: 15050576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modulation of frontal and parietal neuronal activity by visuomotor learning. An ERP analysis of implicit and explicit pursuit tracking tasks. Hill H Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Mar; 91(3):212-24. PubMed ID: 24373887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two Simon tasks with different sources of conflict: an ERP study of motion- and location-based compatibility effects. Galashan D; Wittfoth M; Fehr T; Herrmann M Biol Psychol; 2008 Jul; 78(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 18436365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of alcohol on attention orienting and dual-task performance during simulated driving: an event-related potential study. Wester AE; Verster JC; Volkerts ER; Böcker KB; Kenemans JL J Psychopharmacol; 2010 Sep; 24(9):1333-48. PubMed ID: 20305040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of task difficulty on the features of event-related potential during visual oddball task. Kim KH; Kim JH; Yoon J; Jung KY Neurosci Lett; 2008 Nov; 445(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 18790010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Event-related brain potentials in children with attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder: effects of stimulus deviancy and task relevance in the visual and auditory modality. Kemner C; Verbaten MN; Koelega HS; Buitelaar JK; van der Gaag RJ; Camfferman G; van Engeland H Biol Psychiatry; 1996 Sep; 40(6):522-34. PubMed ID: 8879473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. fMRI in an oddball task: effects of target-to-target interval. Stevens MC; Calhoun VD; Kiehl KA Psychophysiology; 2005 Nov; 42(6):636-42. PubMed ID: 16364059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]