182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22030403)
21. Risk of residual disease and invasive carcinoma in women treated for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
Costales AB; Milbourne AM; Rhodes HE; Munsell MF; Wallbillich JJ; Brown J; Frumovitz M; Ramondetta LM; Schmeler KM
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jun; 129(3):513-6. PubMed ID: 23541795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A study of diagnostic failure of loop conization in microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix.
Tseng CJ; Liang CC; Lin CT; Huang KG; Chou HH; Chang TC; Lai CH; Soong YK; Hsueh S
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Apr; 73(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 10094886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Persistence and recurrence of in situ cervical adenocarcinoma after primary treatment. About 121 cases].
Dedecker F; Graesslin O; Bonneau S; Quéreux C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Jun; 36(6):616-22. PubMed ID: 18539502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Conservative treatment of stage IA1 adenocarcinoma of the cervix during pregnancy.
Yahata T; Numata M; Kashima K; Sekine M; Fujita K; Yamamoto T; Tanaka K
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Apr; 109(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18289649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinicopathologic features of early adenocarcinoma of the cervix initially managed with cervical conization.
Poynor EA; Marshall D; Sonoda Y; Slomovitz BM; Barakat RR; Soslow RA
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec; 103(3):960-5. PubMed ID: 16860853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: the predictive value of conization margin status.
Young JL; Jazaeri AA; Lachance JA; Stoler MH; Irvin WP; Rice LW; Andersen WA; Modesitt SC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 197(2):195.e1-7; discussion 195.e7-8. PubMed ID: 17689647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.
Mathevet P; Dargent D; Roy M; Beau G
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8063242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cervical conization of adenocarcinoma in situ: a predicting model of residual disease.
Tierney KE; Lin PS; Amezcua C; Matsuo K; Ye W; Felix JC; Roman LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 210(4):366.e1-366.e5. PubMed ID: 24370689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Endocervical curettage at conization to predict residual cervical adenocarcinoma in situ.
Lea JS; Shin CH; Sheets EE; Coleman RL; Gehrig PA; Duska LR; Miller DS; Schorge JO
Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Oct; 87(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 12468353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Management of in situ cervical adenocarcinoma].
Graesslin O; Dedecker F; Collinet P; Jouve E; Urbaniack D; Leroy JL; Boulanger JC; Quéreux C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1178-84. PubMed ID: 17097907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fertility sparing treatment for in situ and early invasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
McHale MT; Le TD; Burger RA; Gu M; Rutgers JL; Monk BJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Nov; 98(5 Pt 1):726-31. PubMed ID: 11704160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluating cervical neoplasia. LEEP as an alternative to cold knife conization.
Simmons JR; Anderson L; Hernandez E; Heller PB
J Reprod Med; 1998 Dec; 43(12):1007-13. PubMed ID: 9883402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Postconization surveillance of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ. A prospective trial.
Schorge JO; Lea JS; Ashfaq R
J Reprod Med; 2003 Oct; 48(10):751-5. PubMed ID: 14619639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Can it replace cold knife conization?
Eduardo AM; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Yandell RB; Schnadig VJ
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):729-32. PubMed ID: 8913973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Invasive cervical adenocarcinoma immediately following a cone biopsy for adenocarcinoma in situ with negative margins.
Cohn DE; Morrison CD; Zanagnolo VL; Goist MM; Copeland LJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Jul; 98(1):158-60. PubMed ID: 15913738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Further study of the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ.
Kennedy AW; Biscotti CV
Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Sep; 86(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 12217762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison between loop diathermy conization and cold-knife conization for management of cervical dysplasia associated with unsatisfactory colposcopy.
Oyesanya OA; Amerasinghe C; Manning EA
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Jul; 50(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 8349168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization.
Lapaquette TK; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Doherty MG; Yandell RB; Buchanan VS
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):440-3. PubMed ID: 8355949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The role of loop electrosurgical excisional procedure in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Kim JH; Park JY; Kim DY; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Jul; 145(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 19428171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical outcomes of patients with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix treated by conization.
Taylor JS; Panico V; Caputo T; Gerber D; Gupta D; Pirog E; Holcomb K
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014; 35(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 25556268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
