143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22031415)
1. European ban on stem-cell patents has a silver lining.
Callaway E
Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7370):441. PubMed ID: 22031415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical questions to ponder in the European stem cell patent debate.
Curley D; Sharples A
J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(3):12-6. PubMed ID: 17152135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Europe. Dismay, confusion greet human stem cell patent ban.
Vogel G
Science; 2011 Oct; 334(6055):441-2. PubMed ID: 22034406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. EU bans embryonic stem cell patents but decision may have limited implications.
Harrison C
Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2011 Nov; 10(12):892-3. PubMed ID: 22076510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. European court bans embryonic stem cell patents.
Moran N
Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Dec; 29(12):1057-9. PubMed ID: 22158341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Stem cells caught in morality clause.
Siva N
Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Feb; 27(2):109. PubMed ID: 19204675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Europe halts decisions on stem-cell patents.
Schubert S
Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7043):720-1. PubMed ID: 15944658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Patent fixes for Europe.
van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B
Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7314):395. PubMed ID: 20864973
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Europe rules against stem-cell patents.
Abbott A
Nature; 2011 Mar; 471(7338):280. PubMed ID: 21412307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union on embryonic stem cell patents. On a legal report on patents: the concept and dignity of the human embryo].
Lacadena JR
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2011; (35):145-80. PubMed ID: 22984753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reaction to the Brüstle decision.
Parker S; England P
Pharm Pat Anal; 2012 Jul; 1(3):233-5. PubMed ID: 24236833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. European Commission rethinks biotech patents.
Mitchell P
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1175-6. PubMed ID: 12454654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patenting of human embryonic stem cells in Europe.
Treichel P
Biotechnol J; 2009 Apr; 4(4):462-4. PubMed ID: 19370720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Brüstle decision is unhelpful, but not catastrophic.
Lawford Davies J; Denoon A
Cell Stem Cell; 2011 Dec; 9(6):500-1. PubMed ID: 22136924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomedical patents. Wisconsin stem cell patents upheld.
Holden C
Science; 2008 Mar; 319(5870):1602-3. PubMed ID: 18356497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Biotech patents-business as usual?
Lawrence S
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Dec; 26(12):1326. PubMed ID: 19060861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. 'No' to ban on stem-cell patents.
Smith A
Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7344):418. PubMed ID: 21525916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Sound and fury after stem cell ruling.
Holmes D
Lancet; 2011 Nov; 378(9803):1617. PubMed ID: 22066138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Consternation and confusion following EU patent judgment.
Wilmut I
Cell Stem Cell; 2011 Dec; 9(6):498-9. PubMed ID: 22136922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The morality of biotech patents: differing legal obligations in Europe?
Ford R
Eur Intellect Prop Rev; 1997 Jun; 19(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 16538738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
