These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22031596)
1. Comparison of prosthetic feet prescribed to active individuals using ISO standards. Mason ZD; Pearlman J; Cooper RA; Laferrier JZ Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Dec; 35(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 22031596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical testing of prosthetic feet utilized in low-income countries according to ISO-10328 standard. Jensen JS; Treichl HB Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Jun; 31(2):177-206. PubMed ID: 17520495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Energy expenditure during ambulation in dysvascular and traumatic below-knee amputees: a comparison of five prosthetic feet. Torburn L; Powers CM; Guiterrez R; Perry J J Rehabil Res Dev; 1995 May; 32(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 7562650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical efficiency during gait of adults with transtibial amputation: a pilot study comparing the SACH, Seattle, and Golden-Ankle prosthetic feet. Prince F; Winter DA; Sjonnensen G; Powell C; Wheeldon RK J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jun; 35(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 9651889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in Military Obstacle Course Performance Between Three Energy-Storing and Shock-Adapting Prosthetic Feet in High-Functioning Transtibial Amputees: A Double-Blind, Randomized Control Trial. Highsmith MJ; Kahle JT; Miro RM; Lura DJ; Carey SL; Wernke MM; Kim SH; Quillen WS Mil Med; 2016 Nov; 181(S4):45-54. PubMed ID: 27849461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Symmetry in external work (SEW): a novel method of quantifying gait differences between prosthetic feet. Agrawal V; Gailey R; O'Toole C; Gaunaurd I; Dowell T Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Jun; 33(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 19367518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below-knee amputations. Powers CM; Torburn L; Perry J; Ayyappa E Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Jul; 75(7):825-9. PubMed ID: 8024435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient evaluation of the Echelon foot using the Seattle Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire. Sedki I; Moore R Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Jun; 37(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 23045408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Axial and torsional stiffness of pediatric prosthetic feet. Taboga P; Grabowski AM Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2017 Feb; 42():47-54. PubMed ID: 28095358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Energy storing property of so-called energy-storing prosthetic feet. Ehara Y; Beppu M; Nomura S; Kunimi Y; Takahashi S Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1993 Jan; 74(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 8420524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of prosthetic foot roll-over shape arc length on the gait of trans-tibial prosthesis users. Hansen AH; Meier MR; Sessoms PH; Childress DS Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Dec; 30(3):286-99. PubMed ID: 17162519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Instantaneous stiffness and hysteresis of dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet. Webber CM; Kaufman K Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Oct; 41(5):463-468. PubMed ID: 28008788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in high-functioning transfemoral amputees. Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J; Pros D Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 88(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 17532907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of energy storage and return foot stiffness on walking mechanics and muscle activity in below-knee amputees. Fey NP; Klute GK; Neptune RR Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2011 Dec; 26(10):1025-32. PubMed ID: 21777999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of oxygen consumption for conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in transfemoral amputees. Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J Clin Rehabil; 2008; 22(10-11):896-901. PubMed ID: 18955421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Manufacture of energy storage and return prosthetic feet using selective laser sintering. South BJ; Fey NP; Bosker G; Neptune RR J Biomech Eng; 2010 Jan; 132(1):015001. PubMed ID: 20524754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pressure characteristics at the stump/socket interface in transtibial amputees using an adaptive prosthetic foot. Wolf SI; Alimusaj M; Fradet L; Siegel J; Braatz F Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Dec; 24(10):860-5. PubMed ID: 19744755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Below-knee amputee gait in stair ambulation. A comparison of stride characteristics using five different prosthetic feet. Torburn L; Schweiger GP; Perry J; Powers CM Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jun; (303):185-92. PubMed ID: 8194232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The 'shape&roll' prosthetic foot: I. Design and development of appropriate technology for low-income countries. Sam M; Childress DS; Hansen AH; Meier MR; Lambla S; Grahn EC; Rolock JS Med Confl Surviv; 2004; 20(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 15688881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]