These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22031902)

  • 1. Responding to unfair offers made by a friend: neuroelectrical activity changes in the anterior medial prefrontal cortex.
    Campanhã C; Minati L; Fregni F; Boggio PS
    J Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 31(43):15569-74. PubMed ID: 22031902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining.
    Boksem MA; De Cremer D
    Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 19851940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rejection in Bargaining Situations: An Event-Related Potential Study in Adolescents and Adults.
    Zanolie K; de Cremer D; Güroğlu B; Crone EA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139953. PubMed ID: 26445134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adult-like neuroelectrical response to inequity in children: Evidence from the ultimatum game.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; Kassab AP; Romero RL; Minati L; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2016; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 26079157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A neural signature of the creation of social evaluation.
    Osinsky R; Mussel P; Ohrlein L; Hewig J
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 9(6):731-6. PubMed ID: 23547246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. I'll make you an offer you can refuse: How socially sensitive is the MFN?
    Spapé MM; Dundas K
    Soc Neurosci; 2020 Feb; 15(1):123-127. PubMed ID: 31617454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The time course of neural responses to social versus non-social unfairness in the ultimatum game.
    Chen M; Zhao Z; Lai H
    Soc Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 14(4):409-419. PubMed ID: 29883547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age-related changes in social decision-making: An electrophysiological analysis of unfairness evaluation in the Ultimatum Game.
    Fernandes C; Gonçalves AR; Pasion R; Ferreira-Santos F; Barbosa F; Martins IP; Marques-Teixeira J
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Jan; 692():122-126. PubMed ID: 30391319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural substrates underlying the tendency to accept anger-infused ultimatum offers during dynamic social interactions.
    Gilam G; Lin T; Raz G; Azrielant S; Fruchter E; Ariely D; Hendler T
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():400-11. PubMed ID: 26166623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex.
    Knoch D; Pascual-Leone A; Meyer K; Treyer V; Fehr E
    Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5800):829-32. PubMed ID: 17023614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining.
    Li Q; Dai W; Zheng Y; Wang C; Yang Z; Ren Q; Hu K; Liu X
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Sep; 174():108318. PubMed ID: 35830915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social distance modulates recipient's fairness consideration in the dictator game: an ERP study.
    Wu Y; Leliveld MC; Zhou X
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Dec; 88(2-3):253-62. PubMed ID: 21889968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.
    Sanfey AG; Rilling JK; Aronson JA; Nystrom LE; Cohen JD
    Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5626):1755-8. PubMed ID: 12805551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociation between medial frontal negativity and cardiac responses in the ultimatum game: Effects of offer size and fairness.
    Van der Veen FM; Sahibdin PP
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 11(4):516-25. PubMed ID: 21786030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unfair? It depends: neural correlates of fairness in social context.
    Güroğlu B; van den Bos W; Rombouts SA; Crone EA
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 5(4):414-23. PubMed ID: 20350933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accepting unfairness by a significant other is associated with reduced connectivity between medial prefrontal and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex.
    Fatfouta R; Meshi D; Merkl A; Heekeren HR
    Soc Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 13(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 27813717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Circadian rhythms and decision-making: a review and new evidence from electroencephalography.
    Correa Á; Alguacil S; Ciria LF; Jiménez A; Ruz M
    Chronobiol Int; 2020 Apr; 37(4):520-541. PubMed ID: 32000532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
    Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game.
    Kaltwasser L; Hildebrandt A; Wilhelm O; Sommer W
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27261490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.