These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22031990)

  • 1. Esthetic preferences for facial soft tissue profiles.
    Sukhia RH; Khan M; Fida M; Shaikh A; Azam SI
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):17-23. PubMed ID: 22031990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Esthetic evaluation of the facial profile in rehabilitated adults with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Ferrari Júnior FM; Ayub PV; Capelozza Filho L; Pereira Lauris JR; Garib DG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 73(1):169.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25511967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of chin prominence on esthetic lip profile preferences.
    Coleman GG; Lindauer SJ; Tüfekçi E; Shroff B; Best AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 17628248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial profile preferences among various layers of Turkish population.
    Türkkahraman H; Gökalp H
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):640-7. PubMed ID: 15529499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists.
    Yin L; Jiang M; Chen W; Smales RJ; Wang Q; Tang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):750-6. PubMed ID: 24880845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of well-balanced lip position by Japanese orthodontic patients.
    Shimomura T; Ioi H; Nakata S; Counts AL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):e291-7. PubMed ID: 21457834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
    Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A comparative study of cephalometric evaluation criteria of the cutaneous profile].
    De Coster T
    Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 2():559-72. PubMed ID: 1749613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored Japanese facial profiles.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 16102406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese and Korean orthodontists and orthodontic patients.
    Ioi H; Kang S; Shimomura T; Kim SS; Park SB; Son WS; Takahashi I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 22999668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The profile and tegmental growth].
    Nanda RS
    Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 3():829-62. PubMed ID: 1842255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Study on perception of Shanghai population with labial profile].
    Tang GH; Ji GP; Ding XJ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2003 Apr; 12(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 14661511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women.
    Michiels G; Sather AH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 7989819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of preferred lip positions according to different age groups.
    Park NS; Park JH; Bayome M; Mo SS; Kim Y; Kook YA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 42(5):637-42. PubMed ID: 23141151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nasolabial angle: a perception of treatment needs.
    Sukhia RH; Sukhia HR; Fida M; Khan M
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(2):41-4. PubMed ID: 22873023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile.
    Nanda RS; Meng H; Kapila S; Goorhuis J
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 2389850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Huang YP; Li WR
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 25347046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile.
    Czarnecki ST; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 8338071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.