These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22032446)

  • 1. The impact of childhood cochlear implantation on deaf education.
    Powell J; Wilson JA
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2011 Oct; 36(5):417. PubMed ID: 22032446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changing expectations for children with cochlear implants.
    Moog JS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2002 May; 189():138-42. PubMed ID: 12018341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Classroom performance of children with cochlear implants in mainstream education.
    Damen GW; van den Oever-Goltstein MH; Langereis MC; Chute PM; Mylanus EA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2006 Jul; 115(7):542-52. PubMed ID: 16900809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children.
    Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clarification requests in everyday interaction involving children with cochlear implants.
    Samuelsson C; Lyxell B
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2014 Oct; 39(3):130-8. PubMed ID: 23631679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spectral density affects the intelligibility of tone-vocoded speech: Implications for cochlear implant simulations.
    Rosen S; Zhang Y; Speers K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL318-23. PubMed ID: 26428833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The multi-channel cochlear implant: multi-disciplinary development of electrical stimulation of the cochlea and the resulting clinical benefit.
    Clark GM
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():4-13. PubMed ID: 25159273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Being an adolescent with a cochlear implant in the world of hearing people: coping in school, in society and with self identity.
    Rich S; Levinger M; Werner S; Adelman C
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Aug; 77(8):1337-44. PubMed ID: 23800472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Educational, employment, and social participation of young adult graduates from the paediatric Southern Cochlear Implant Programme, New Zealand.
    Goh T; Bird P; Pearson J; Mustard J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016; 17(1):31-51. PubMed ID: 26214230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PET-imaging of brain plasticity after cochlear implantation.
    Strelnikov K; Marx M; Lagleyre S; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():180-7. PubMed ID: 25448166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Getting a decent (but sparse) signal to the brain for users of cochlear implants.
    Wilson BS
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():24-38. PubMed ID: 25500178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Education and rehabilitation of deaf children with cochlear implants: a multidisciplinary task.
    De Raeve L
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():7-14. PubMed ID: 21756580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Considering optogenetic stimulation for cochlear implants.
    Jeschke M; Moser T
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():224-34. PubMed ID: 25601298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear implants: an educational perspective past, present, and future.
    Shaw T; Ogg V
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Aug; 12 Suppl 2():S19-23. PubMed ID: 21917212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of reverberant self- and overlap-masking on speech recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
    Desmond JM; Collins LM; Throckmorton CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):EL304-10. PubMed ID: 24907838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of envelope bandwidth on importance functions for cochlear implant simulations.
    Whitmal NA; DeMaio D; Lin R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):733-44. PubMed ID: 25698008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early UCSF contributions to the development of multiple-channel cochlear implants.
    Merzenich MM
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():39-46. PubMed ID: 25560478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding in everyday life situations; results from paediatric cochlear implant users.
    Frohne-Buechner C; Buechner A; Kreibohm K; Brendel M; Ruehl S; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T; Frohne-Buechner C; Brendel M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():291-5. PubMed ID: 21756634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The early days of the multi channel cochlear implant: efforts and achievement in France.
    Chouard CH
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():47-51. PubMed ID: 25499127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ideal time-frequency masking algorithms lead to different speech intelligibility and quality in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Koning R; Madhu N; Wouters J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 62(1):331-41. PubMed ID: 25167542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.