330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22032575)
21. Pathology reporting of breast cancer: trends in 1989-1999, following the introduction of mammographic screening in Western Australia.
Harvey JM; Sterrett GF; McEvoy S; Fritschi L; Jamrozik K; Ingram D; Joseph D; Dewar J; Byrne MJ;
Pathology; 2005 Oct; 37(5):341-6. PubMed ID: 16194843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Usefulness of a synoptic data tool for reporting of head and neck neoplasms based on the College of American Pathologists cancer checklists.
Kang HP; Devine LJ; Piccoli AL; Seethala RR; Amin W; Parwani AV
Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Oct; 132(4):521-30. PubMed ID: 19762529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Deficiencies in pathological reporting of colorectal cancer in Victoria.
Winn RD; Robinson DR; Farmer KC; Bell SW
ANZ J Surg; 2008 Sep; 78(9):796-9. PubMed ID: 18844912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Lung carcinoma surgical pathology report adequacy: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of over 8300 cases from 464 institutions.
Gephardt GN; Baker PB
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Oct; 120(10):922-7. PubMed ID: 12046605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Accuracy and Speed of Information Identification by Nonpathologists in Synoptic Reports With Different Formats.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 141(3):418-422. PubMed ID: 28055242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bone Marrow Synoptic Reporting for Hematologic Neoplasms: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.
Sever C; Abbott CL; de Baca ME; Khoury JD; Perkins SL; Reichard KK; Taylor A; Terebelo HR; Colasacco C; Rumble RB; Thomas NE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Sep; 140(9):932-49. PubMed ID: 26905483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Developments in the assessment of venous invasion in colorectal cancer: implications for future practice and patient outcome.
Messenger DE; Driman DK; Kirsch R
Hum Pathol; 2012 Jul; 43(7):965-73. PubMed ID: 22406362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Development and implementation of a synoptic MRI report for preoperative staging of rectal cancer on a population-based level.
Kennedy ED; Milot L; Fruitman M; Al-Sukhni E; Heine G; Schmocker S; Brown G; McLeod RS
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Jun; 57(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 24807594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pathology reporting of pelvic exenteration specimens for locally recurrent rectal cancer.
Däster S; Shin JS; Loizides S; Steffens D; Koh CE; Solomon MJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2100-2107. PubMed ID: 33895021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Completeness of low anterior resection pathology report: a hospital-based audit with recommendations on improving reporting.
Nambiar A; Vivek N; Bindu MR; Sudheer OV; Bai L
Indian J Cancer; 2010; 47(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 20448379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinically relevant breast cancer reporting: using process measures to improve anatomic pathology reporting.
Hammond EH; Flinner RL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Nov; 121(11):1171-5. PubMed ID: 9372744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.
Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The computerized synoptic operative report: a novel tool in surgical residency education.
Gur I; Gur D; Recabaren JA
Arch Surg; 2012 Jan; 147(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 21930975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Updated protocol for the examination of specimens removed from patients with colorectal carcinoma. A basis for checklists.
Compton CC; Henson DE; Hutter RV; Sobin LH; Bowman HE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Dec; 121(12):1247-54. PubMed ID: 9431313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Upper gastrointestinal cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit to compare standards with minimum datasets.
King PM; Blazeby JM; Gupta J; Alderson D; Moorghen M
J Clin Pathol; 2004 Jul; 57(7):702-5. PubMed ID: 15220361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Quality control of 135 histopathological reports of colo-rectal carcinoma].
Reyes E; Bencosme C; Candanedo F; Cortés R; Angeles-Angeles A
Rev Invest Clin; 1998; 50(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 9763889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Standardization of the surgical pathology report: formats, templates, and synoptic reports.
Leslie KO; Rosai J
Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Nov; 11(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 7878300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Structured pathology reporting improves the macroscopic assessment of rectal tumour resection specimens.
King S; Dimech M; Johnstone S
Pathology; 2016 Jun; 48(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 27114373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pathology reporting of rectal cancer: a national audit.
Keating J; Lolohea S; Kenwright D
N Z Med J; 2003 Jul; 116(1178):U514. PubMed ID: 12897882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Interobserver variation in the reporting of local peritoneal involvement and extramural venous invasion in colonic cancer.
Littleford SE; Baird A; Rotimi O; Verbeke CS; Scott N
Histopathology; 2009 Oct; 55(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 19817891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
