These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement. Parekh-Bhurke S; Kwok CS; Pang C; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder JJ; Sutton AJ; Hing CB; Harvey I; Song F J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 20800992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How to interpret a meta-analysis and judge its value as a guide for clinical practice. Zlowodzki M; Poolman RW; Kerkhoffs GM; Tornetta P; Bhandari M; Acta Orthop; 2007 Oct; 78(5):598-609. PubMed ID: 17966018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients. Iorio A; Spencer FA; Falavigna M; Alba C; Lang E; Burnand B; McGinn T; Hayden J; Williams K; Shea B; Wolff R; Kujpers T; Perel P; Vandvik PO; Glasziou P; Schunemann H; Guyatt G BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h870. PubMed ID: 25775931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Developing the evidence base for the new guidelines for reduction of cardiovascular risk for children by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Gidding SS Cardiol Young; 2011 Dec; 21 Suppl 2():165-8. PubMed ID: 22152544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical practice guidelines versus systematic reviews; which serve as the best basis for evidence-based spine medicine? Freeman MD Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):512-3. PubMed ID: 20494813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. Guyatt GH; Oxman AD; Schünemann HJ; Tugwell P; Knottnerus A J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 21185693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Medical truths]. Haug C Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Jun; 125(11):1469. PubMed ID: 15940307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?]. Antes G; von Elm E Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Aug; 134(33):1619. PubMed ID: 19650021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evidence-based medicine is gold standard for medical guidelines]. Pfennig A; Hölter G Psychiatr Prax; 2011 Jul; 38(5):218-20. PubMed ID: 21695665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations. Manchikanti L Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cancer survivorship research and guidelines: maybe the cart should be beside the horse. Earle CC J Clin Oncol; 2007 Sep; 25(25):3800-1. PubMed ID: 17646665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Don't be misled by the orthopedic literature : tips for critical appraisal. Poolman RW; Kerkhoffs GM; Struijs PA; Bhandari M; International Evidence-Based Orthopedic Surgery Working Group Acta Orthop; 2007 Apr; 78(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 17464602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence-based public health: what does it offer developing countries? McMichael C; Waters E; Volmink J J Public Health (Oxf); 2005 Jun; 27(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 15820994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using evidence in pain practice: Part II: Interpreting and applying systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines. Chou R Pain Med; 2008; 9(5):531-41. PubMed ID: 18346061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pragmatism, dynamism and flexibility in research and clinical practice. Acharya G Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Apr; 94(4):345-6. PubMed ID: 25761442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]