255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22033059)
1. Caution when using prognostic models: a prospective comparison of 3 recent prognostic models.
Nassar AP; Mocelin AO; Nunes AL; Giannini FP; Brauer L; Andrade FM; Dias CA
J Crit Care; 2012 Aug; 27(4):423.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22033059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of six mortality prediction models in patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock to the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study.
Arabi Y; Al Shirawi N; Memish Z; Venkatesh S; Al-Shimemeri A
Crit Care; 2003 Oct; 7(5):R116-22. PubMed ID: 12974979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients.
Zimmerman JE; Kramer AA; McNair DS; Malila FM
Crit Care Med; 2006 May; 34(5):1297-310. PubMed ID: 16540951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of the third-generation models of severity scoring systems (APACHE IV, SAPS 3 and MPM-III) in acute kidney injury critically ill patients.
Costa e Silva VT; de Castro I; Liaño F; Muriel A; Rodríguez-Palomares JR; Yu L
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2011 Dec; 26(12):3894-901. PubMed ID: 21505093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of standard severity scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients admitted to a respiratory intensive care unit in North India.
Aggarwal AN; Sarkar P; Gupta D; Jindal SK
Respirology; 2006 Mar; 11(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 16548906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparing the performance of three severity scoring systems for ICU patients: APACHE III, SAPS II, MPM II].
Kim EK; Kwon YD; Hwang JH
J Prev Med Public Health; 2005 Aug; 38(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16323627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the performance of a model based on administrative data and a model based on clinical data: effect of severity of illness on standardized mortality ratios of intensive care units.
Brinkman S; Abu-Hanna A; van der Veen A; de Jonge E; de Keizer NF
Crit Care Med; 2012 Feb; 40(2):373-8. PubMed ID: 21983367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation III outcome prediction in patients admitted to the intensive care unit after pneumonectomy.
Keegan MT; Harrison BA; Brown DR; Whalen FX; Cassivi SD; Afessa B
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Dec; 21(6):832-7. PubMed ID: 18068061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and validation of a model that uses enhanced administrative data to predict mortality in patients with sepsis.
Lagu T; Lindenauer PK; Rothberg MB; Nathanson BH; Pekow PS; Steingrub JS; Higgins TL
Crit Care Med; 2011 Nov; 39(11):2425-30. PubMed ID: 22005222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic models based on administrative data alone inadequately predict the survival outcomes for critically ill patients at 180 days post-hospital discharge.
Bohensky MA; Jolley D; Pilcher DV; Sundararajan V; Evans S; Brand CA
J Crit Care; 2012 Aug; 27(4):422.e11-21. PubMed ID: 22591572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of newer scoring systems with the conventional scoring systems in general intensive care population.
Juneja D; Singh O; Nasa P; Dang R
Minerva Anestesiol; 2012 Feb; 78(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 22095102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Mortality Probability Admission Model III, National Quality Forum, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV hospital mortality models: implications for national benchmarking*.
Kramer AA; Higgins TL; Zimmerman JE
Crit Care Med; 2014 Mar; 42(3):544-53. PubMed ID: 24158174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of single intensive care unit performance by simplified acute physiology score II system.
Desa K; Sustić A; Zupan Z; Krstulović B; Golubović V
Croat Med J; 2005 Dec; 46(6):964-9. PubMed ID: 16342351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of three prognostic models in patients with cancer in need of intensive care in a medical center in China.
Xing X; Gao Y; Wang H; Huang C; Qu S; Zhang H; Wang H; Sun K
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131329. PubMed ID: 26110534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of APACHE II and SAPS II scoring systems in predicting hospital mortality in Thai adult intensive care units.
Khwannimit B; Geater A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Apr; 90(4):643-52. PubMed ID: 17487117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of predictive accuracy among six prognosis prediction systems for patient mortality in intensive care units.
Chao CL
J Formos Med Assoc; 2002 Jun; 101(6):406-15. PubMed ID: 12189646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of six severity-of-illness scores in cancer patients requiring admission to the intensive care unit: a prospective observational study.
Soares M; Fontes F; Dantas J; Gadelha D; Cariello P; Nardes F; Amorim C; Toscano L; Rocco JR
Crit Care; 2004 Aug; 8(4):R194-203. PubMed ID: 15312218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of neuro-intensive care unit performance in China: predicting outcomes of Simplified Acute Physiology Score II or Glasgow Coma Scale.
Zhao XX; Su YY; Wang M; Zhang Y; Ye H; Feng HH; Zhang YZ; Gao DQ; Chen WB
Chin Med J (Engl); 2013 Mar; 126(6):1132-7. PubMed ID: 23506592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Illness severity scoring for Intensive Care at Middlemore Hospital, New Zealand: past and future.
Mann SL; Marshall MR; Holt A; Woodford B; Williams AB
N Z Med J; 2010 Jun; 123(1316):47-65. PubMed ID: 20648099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of SAPS II and SAPS 3 in a Norwegian intensive care unit population.
Strand K; Søreide E; Aardal S; Flaatten H
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 May; 53(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 19419352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
