These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2203330)

  • 1. An electron microscopic evaluation of the enamel surface subsequent to various debonding procedures.
    Howell S; Weekes WT
    Aust Dent J; 1990 Jun; 35(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 2203330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods.
    Vidor MM; Felix RP; Marchioro EM; Hahn L
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 25992989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In-vivo evaluation of the surface roughness and morphology of enamel after bracket removal and polishing by different techniques.
    Faria-Júnior ÉM; Guiraldo RD; Berger SB; Correr AB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Contreras EF; Lopes MB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 25726399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Polishing after debracketing: its influence upon enamel surface.
    Vieira AC; Pinto RA; Chevitarese O; Almeida MA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1993; 18(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 8110615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finishing of enamel surfaces after debonding of orthodontic attachments.
    Retief DH; Denys FR
    Angle Orthod; 1979 Jan; 49(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 369407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding.
    Osorio R; Toledano M; García-Godoy F
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1998; 65(5):313-7, 354. PubMed ID: 9795734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enamel surfaces after orthodontic bracket debonding.
    Campbell PM
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 7785800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study.
    Zarrinnia K; Eid NM; Kehoe MJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):284-93. PubMed ID: 7661146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of traditional orthodontic polishing systems with novel non-orthodontic methods for residual adhesive removal.
    Andrews J; Hagan JL; Armbruster PC; Ballard RW
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 27468590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of enamel preparation on the tensile bond strength of orthodontic composite resin.
    Gerbo LR; Lacefield WR; Wells BR; Russell CM
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(4):275-81; discussion 282. PubMed ID: 1333734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enamel colour changes after debonding using various bonding systems.
    Zaher AR; Abdalla EM; Abdel Motie MA; Rehman NA; Kassem H; Athanasiou AE
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 22773670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early versus delayed rebonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Ahrari F; Poosti M; Akbari M; Sadri K
    Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 22583583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding: A Comparative Study using Three Different Burs.
    Garg R; Dixit P; Khosla T; Gupta P; Kalra H; Kumar P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):521-526. PubMed ID: 29807961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel after various post-stripping polishing methods: an in vitro study.
    Gupta P; Gupta N; Patel N; Gupta R; Sandhu GS; Naik C
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 23304974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy.
    Alessandri Bonetti G; Zanarini M; Incerti Parenti S; Lattuca M; Marchionni S; Gatto MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 22051490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface roughness and wettability of enamel and dentine surfaces prepared with different dental burs.
    Al-Omari WM; Mitchell CA; Cunningham JL
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jul; 28(7):645-50. PubMed ID: 11422697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding.
    Cardoso LA; Valdrighi HC; Vedovello Filho M; Correr AB
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):105-12. PubMed ID: 25628087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Changes in the enamel after in vitro debonding of brackets bonded with a modified glass ionomer cement].
    Sorel O; el Alam R; Chagneau F; Cathelineau G
    Orthod Fr; 2000 Apr; 71(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 10916640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization of a procedure for rebonding dislodged orthodontic brackets.
    Mui B; Rossouw PE; Kulkarni GV
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 10371435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enamel preparation for orthodontic bonding: a comparison between the use of a sandblaster and current techniques.
    Reisner KR; Levitt HL; Mante F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Apr; 111(4):366-73. PubMed ID: 9109581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.