These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22034057)

  • 1. Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases.
    Fiorentino F; Caiazzo F; Napolitano S; Spizzichino L; Bono S; Sessa M; Nuccitelli A; Biricik A; Gordon A; Rizzo G; Baldi M
    Prenat Diagn; 2011 Dec; 31(13):1270-82. PubMed ID: 22034057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism in over 1600 cases using array comparative genomic hybridization as a first line test.
    Carey L; Scott F; Murphy K; Mansfield N; Barahona P; Leigh D; Robertson R; McLennan A
    Prenat Diagn; 2014 May; 34(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 24453008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic utility of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in a prenatal setting.
    Maya I; Davidov B; Gershovitz L; Zalzstein Y; Taub E; Coppinger J; Shaffer LG; Shohat M
    Prenat Diagn; 2010 Dec; 30(12-13):1131-7. PubMed ID: 20925131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prenatal diagnosis: array comparative genomic hybridization in fetuses with abnormal sonographic findings.
    Vestergaard EM; Christensen R; Petersen OB; Vogel I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Jul; 92(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 23590624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical validity of karyotyping for the diagnosis of chromosomal imbalance following array comparative genomic hybridisation.
    Gekas J; Vallée M; Castonguay L; Laframboise R; Maranda B; Piedboeuf B; Rousseau F
    J Med Genet; 2011 Dec; 48(12):851-5. PubMed ID: 21965346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. aCGH on chorionic villi mirrors the complexity of fetoplacental mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis.
    Filges I; Kang A; Klug V; Wenzel F; Heinimann K; Tercanli S; Miny P
    Prenat Diagn; 2011 May; 31(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 21351283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pallister-Killian syndrome: Cytogenetics and molecular investigations of mosaic tetrasomy 12p in prenatal chorionic villus and in amniocytes. Strategy of prenatal diagnosis.
    Libotte F; Bizzoco D; Gabrielli I; Mesoraca A; Cignini P; Vitale SG; Marilli I; Gulino FA; Rapisarda AM; Giorlandino C
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 55(6):863-866. PubMed ID: 28040135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prenatal diagnosis using combined quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction and array comparative genomic hybridization analysis as a first-line test: results from over 1000 consecutive cases.
    Scott F; Murphy K; Carey L; Greville W; Mansfield N; Barahona P; Robertson R; McLennan A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 23401365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases.
    Van den Veyver IB; Patel A; Shaw CA; Pursley AN; Kang SH; Simovich MJ; Ward PA; Darilek S; Johnson A; Neill SE; Bi W; White LD; Eng CM; Lupski JR; Cheung SW; Beaudet AL
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 Jan; 29(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 19012303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applications of array comparative genomic hybridization in obstetrics.
    Fruhman G; Van den Veyver IB
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2010 Mar; 37(1):71-85, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 20494259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic medicine in prenatal diagnosis.
    South ST; Chen Z; Brothman AR
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 51(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 18303500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature.
    Breman A; Pursley AN; Hixson P; Bi W; Ward P; Bacino CA; Shaw C; Lupski JR; Beaudet A; Patel A; Cheung SW; Van den Veyver I
    Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 22467166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of array comparative genomic hybridization for genetic analysis of chorionic villus sampling from pregnancy loss in comparison to karyotyping and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.
    Deshpande M; Harper J; Holloway M; Palmer R; Wang R
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2010 Jun; 14(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 20408732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncovering recurrent microdeletion syndromes and subtelomeric deletions/duplications through non-selective application of a MLPA-based extended prenatal panel in routine prenatal diagnosis.
    Konialis C; Hagnefelt B; Sevastidou S; Karapanou S; Pispili K; Markaki A; Pangalos C
    Prenat Diagn; 2011 Jun; 31(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 21448863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Routine use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) as standard approach for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. Clinical experience of 1763 prenatal cases.
    Papoulidis I; Sotiriadis A; Siomou E; Papageorgiou E; Eleftheriades M; Papadopoulos V; Oikonomidou E; Orru S; Manolakos E; Athanasiadis A
    Prenat Diagn; 2015 Dec; 35(13):1269-77. PubMed ID: 26289927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The application and significance in prenatal diagnosis using G-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization].
    Zhang WS; Chen QN; Wu XH; Liang QH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 26(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19350506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dilemmas in Prenatal Chromosomal Diagnosis Revealed Through a Single Center's 30 Years' Experience and 90,000 Cases.
    Konialis C; Pangalos C
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2015; 38(3):218-32. PubMed ID: 25659342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual testing with QF-PCR and karyotype analysis for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. Evaluation of 13,500 cases with consideration of using QF-PCR as a stand-alone test according to referral indications.
    Papoulidis I; Siomou E; Sotiriadis A; Efstathiou G; Psara A; Sevastopoulou E; Anastasakis E; Sifakis S; Tsiligianni T; Kontodiou M; Malamaki C; Tzimina M; Petersen MB; Manolakos E; Athanasiadis A
    Prenat Diagn; 2012 Jul; 32(7):680-5. PubMed ID: 22513450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from ring chromosome 4.
    Chen CP; Chen M; Su YN; Tsai FJ; Chern SR; Wu PC; Chen WL; Chen LF; Pan CW; Wang W
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 50(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 21791306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray.
    Coppinger J; Alliman S; Lamb AN; Torchia BS; Bejjani BA; Shaffer LG
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 Dec; 29(12):1156-66. PubMed ID: 19795450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.