These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22035382)

  • 1. Environmental life cycle assessment of permeable reactive barriers: effects of construction methods, reactive materials and groundwater constituents.
    Mak MS; Lo IM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Dec; 45(23):10148-54. PubMed ID: 22035382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Synergistic effect of coupling zero-valent iron with iron oxide-coated sand in columns for chromate and arsenate removal from groundwater: Influences of humic acid and the reactive media configuration.
    Mak MS; Lo IM; Liu T
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(19):6575-84. PubMed ID: 22018698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Life-cycle case study comparison of permeable reactive barrier versus pump-and-treat remediation.
    Higgins MR; Olson TM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9432-8. PubMed ID: 20000540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Zero-valent iron and iron oxide-coated sand as a combination for removal of co-present chromate and arsenate from groundwater with humic acid.
    Mak MS; Rao P; Lo IM
    Environ Pollut; 2011 Feb; 159(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 21130550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the Cr(VI) reduction efficiency of a permeable reactive barrier using Cr isotope measurements and 2D reactive transport modeling.
    Wanner C; Zink S; Eggenberger U; Mäder U
    J Contam Hydrol; 2012 Apr; 131(1-4):54-63. PubMed ID: 22343010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cr(VI)-contaminated groundwater remediation with simulated permeable reactive barrier (PRB) filled with natural pyrite as reactive material: Environmental factors and effectiveness.
    Liu Y; Mou H; Chen L; Mirza ZA; Liu L
    J Hazard Mater; 2015 Nov; 298():83-90. PubMed ID: 26026959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier for the treatment of arsenic in groundwater: Part 1. Hydrogeochemical studies.
    Wilkin RT; Acree SD; Ross RR; Beak DG; Lee TR
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 19167133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of barrier materials for removing pollutants from groundwater rich in natural organic matter.
    Kozyatnyk I; Haglund P; Lövgren L; Tysklind M; Gustafsson A; Törneman N
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 70(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 25026576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ten year performance evaluation of a field-scale zero-valent iron permeable reactive barrier installed to remediate trichloroethene contaminated groundwater.
    Phillips DH; Van Nooten T; Bastiaens L; Russell MI; Dickson K; Plant S; Ahad JM; Newton T; Elliot T; Kalin RM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(10):3861-9. PubMed ID: 20420442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Removal of added nitrate in the single, binary, and ternary systems of cotton burr compost, zerovalent iron, and sediment: Implications for groundwater nitrate remediation using permeable reactive barriers.
    Su C; Puls RW
    Chemosphere; 2007 Apr; 67(8):1653-62. PubMed ID: 17257645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanistic investigations of Se(VI) treatment in anoxic groundwater using granular iron and organic carbon: an EXAFS study.
    Gibson BD; Blowes DW; Lindsay MB; Ptacek CJ
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 Nov; 241-242():92-100. PubMed ID: 23040313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influences of redox transformation, metal complexation and aggregation of fulvic acid and humic acid on Cr(VI) and As(V) removal by zero-valent iron.
    Mak MS; Lo IM
    Chemosphere; 2011 Jun; 84(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 21530997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental impacts of remediation of a trichloroethene-contaminated site: life cycle assessment of remediation alternatives.
    Lemming G; Hauschild MZ; Chambon J; Binning PJ; Bulle C; Margni M; Bjerg PL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Dec; 44(23):9163-9. PubMed ID: 21053954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier for the treatment of arsenic in groundwater: Part 2. Geochemical modeling and solid phase studies.
    Beak DG; Wilkin RT
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):15-28. PubMed ID: 19167132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Permeable reactive biobarriers for in situ Cr(VI) reduction: bench scale tests using Cellulomonas sp. strain ES6.
    Viamajala S; Peyton BM; Gerlach R; Sivaswamy V; Apel WA; Petersen JN
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Dec; 101(6):1150-62. PubMed ID: 18683257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrated evaluation of the performance of a more than seven year old permeable reactive barrier at a site contaminated with chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons (CAHs).
    Muchitsch N; Van Nooten T; Bastiaens L; Kjeldsen P
    J Contam Hydrol; 2011 Nov; 126(3-4):258-70. PubMed ID: 22115091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-objective optimization of permeable reactive barrier design for Cr(VI) removal from groundwater.
    Maamoun I; Eljamal O; Falyouna O; Eljamal R; Sugihara Y
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2020 Sep; 200():110773. PubMed ID: 32464445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Life cycle based risk assessment of recycled materials in roadway construction.
    Carpenter AC; Gardner KH; Fopiano J; Benson CH; Edil TB
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(10):1458-64. PubMed ID: 17499986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is there an environmental benefit from remediation of a contaminated site? Combined assessments of the risk reduction and life cycle impact of remediation.
    Lemming G; Chambon JC; Binning PJ; Bjerg PL
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 112():392-403. PubMed ID: 22985675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The potential of compost-based biobarriers for Cr(VI) removal from contaminated groundwater: column test.
    Boni MR; Sbaffoni S
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jul; 166(2-3):1087-95. PubMed ID: 19153005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.