472 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22035909)
1. [Renal angiomyolipomas without fat component: tomodensitometric and histologic characteristics, clinical course].
Negre T; Faure A; Andre M; Daniel L; Coulange C; Lechevallier E
Prog Urol; 2011 Nov; 21(12):837-41. PubMed ID: 22035909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical correlates of renal angiomyolipoma subtypes in 209 patients: classic, fat poor, tuberous sclerosis associated and epithelioid.
Lane BR; Aydin H; Danforth TL; Zhou M; Remer EM; Novick AC; Campbell SC
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):836-43. PubMed ID: 18635231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ten uncommon and unusual variants of renal angiomyolipoma (AML): radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Schieda N; Kielar AZ; Al Dandan O; McInnes MD; Flood TA
Clin Radiol; 2015 Feb; 70(2):206-20. PubMed ID: 25468637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Renal Angiomyolipoma: Radiologic Classification and Imaging Features According to the Amount of Fat.
Park BK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):826-835. PubMed ID: 28726505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [New approach to diagnosis, immunophenotypic verification and prognostic prediction for renal angiomyolipoma].
Demyashkin GA; Zaborskii IN
Urologiia; 2018 Mar; (1):35-41. PubMed ID: 29634132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tuberose sclerosis complex: analysis of growth rates aids differentiation of renal cell carcinoma from atypical or minimal-fat-containing angiomyolipoma.
Patel U; Simpson E; Kingswood JC; Saggar-Malik AK
Clin Radiol; 2005 Jun; 60(6):665-73; discussion 663-4. PubMed ID: 16038693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from papillary renal cell carcinoma by helical CT.
Zhang YY; Luo S; Liu Y; Xu RT
Clin Radiol; 2013 Apr; 68(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 23321146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Epithelioid angiomyolipoma presenting as an urothelial.
Moreno-RodrÃguez MM; Casco FG; Caro-Cuenca T; Santiago-Agredano B; Carrasco-Aznar JC
Arch Esp Urol; 2012 Sep; 65(7):702-5. PubMed ID: 22971767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Angiomyolipoma being surgically excised for presumed kidney carcinoma.
Hou W; Xiao H; Liu G; Ji Z
Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jul; 47(7):1037-43. PubMed ID: 25940032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Diagnostic criteria and management options for renal angiomyolipoma: about 8 cases].
El Majdoub A; Khallouk A; Farih MH
Pan Afr Med J; 2016; 25():182. PubMed ID: 28292144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma: computed tomography manifestation and radiologic-pathologic correlation depending on different epithelioid component percentages.
Luo C; Liu Z; Gao M; Hu Q; He X; Xi Y; Cai F; Zhang R; Zeng X; Xiao N
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Jan; 47(1):310-319. PubMed ID: 34664098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma with atypia: a series of 40 cases with emphasis on clinicopathologic prognostic indicators of malignancy.
Brimo F; Robinson B; Guo C; Zhou M; Latour M; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 May; 34(5):715-22. PubMed ID: 20410812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma?
Yang CW; Shen SH; Chang YH; Chung HJ; Wang JH; Lin AT; Chen KK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1017-28. PubMed ID: 24147472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unenhanced CT for the diagnosis of minimal-fat renal angiomyolipoma.
Schieda N; Hodgdon T; El-Khodary M; Flood TA; McInnes MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):1236-41. PubMed ID: 25415700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unenhanced CT and MRI Parameters That Can Be Used to Reliably Predict Fat-Invisible Angiomyolipoma.
Jeong CJ; Park BK; Park JJ; Kim CK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Feb; 206(2):340-7. PubMed ID: 26797361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Chaudhry HS; Davenport MS; Nieman CM; Ho LM; Neville AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 22268181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The different faces of renal angiomyolipomas on radiologic imaging: a pictorial review.
Thiravit S; Teerasamit W; Thiravit P
Br J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 91(1084):20170533. PubMed ID: 29327940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation of morphological and enhancement features from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Sung CK; Kim SH; Woo S; Moon MH; Kim SY; Kim SH; Cho JY
Acta Radiol; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1114-22. PubMed ID: 26663389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fat poor angiomyolipoma differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at 320-slice dynamic volume CT perfusion.
Chen C; Kang Q; Xu B; Shi Z; Guo H; Wei Q; Lu Y; Wu X
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 May; 43(5):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 28828638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
