244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22036203)
1. Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer.
ElSahwi KS; Hooper C; De Leon MC; Gallo TN; Ratner E; Silasi DA; Santin AD; Schwartz PE; Rutherford TJ; Azodi M
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Feb; 124(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 22036203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging.
Veljovich DS; Paley PJ; Drescher CW; Everett EN; Shah C; Peters WA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):679.e1-9; discussion 679.e9-10. PubMed ID: 18538151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman?
Gehrig PA; Cantrell LA; Shafer A; Abaid LN; Mendivil A; Boggess JF
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Oct; 111(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18694588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma.
Subramaniam A; Kim KH; Bryant SA; Zhang B; Sikes C; Kimball KJ; Kilgore LC; Huh WK; Straughn JM; Alvarez RD
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):604-7. PubMed ID: 21658752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic surgery: changing the surgical approach for endometrial cancer in a referral cancer center.
Peiretti M; Zanagnolo V; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Colombo N; Minig L; Sanguineti F; Maggioni A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(4):427-31. PubMed ID: 19467930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution.
Jung YW; Lee DW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim JH; Kim JW; Kim YT
J Surg Oncol; 2010 Feb; 101(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 19902479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy in women with high grade endometrial cancer: a multi-site study performed at high volume cancer centers.
Fader AN; Seamon LG; Escobar PF; Frasure HE; Havrilesky LA; Zanotti KM; Secord AA; Boggess JF; Cohn DE; Fowler JM; Skafianos G; Rossi E; Gehrig PA
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Aug; 126(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 22555102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of robotic-assisted surgery outcomes with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging in Turkey.
Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Nov; 282(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 20652285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic surgical staging for obese patients with endometrial cancer.
Tang KY; Gardiner SK; Gould C; Osmundsen B; Collins M; Winter WE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):513.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22409959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 11733973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A cost analysis of postoperative management in endometrial cancer patients treated by robotics versus laparoscopic approach.
Martino MA; Shubella J; Thomas MB; Morcrette RM; Schindler J; Williams S; Boulay R
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Dec; 123(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 21968341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short- and long-term morbidity and outcomes after robotic surgery for comprehensive endometrial cancer staging.
Backes FJ; Brudie LA; Farrell MR; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ; Bigsby GE; O'Malley D; Cohn DE; Holloway RW; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 125(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 22387522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report.
Fader AN; Escobar PF
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19481243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical outcomes in endometrial cancer care when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to robotics.
Mok ZW; Yong EL; Low JJ; Ng JS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jun; 22(5):819-25. PubMed ID: 22561178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer with increased nodal yield.
Lavery HJ; Martinez-Suarez HJ; Abaza R
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1802-5. PubMed ID: 21070571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy.
Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Ridgway M; Skinner EN; Fowler WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):360.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18928974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
