247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22036203)
21. Robotic surgical staging for endometrial and cervical cancers in medically ill patients.
Siesto G; Ornaghi S; Iedà N; Vitobello D
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jun; 129(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 23454499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy.
Holtz DO; Miroshnichenko G; Finnegan MO; Chernick M; Dunton CJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 20547112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
Ko EM; Muto MG; Berkowitz RS; Feltmate CM
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 18929400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
Seamon LG; Fowler JM; Richardson DL; Carlson MJ; Valmadre S; Phillips GS; Cohn DE
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 19428096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.
Wong CK; Wong YH; Lo LS; Tai CM; Ng TK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Aug; 31(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 16018773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program.
Smith AL; Krivak TC; Scott EM; Rauh-Hain JA; Sukumvanich P; Olawaiye AB; Richard SD
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 126(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 22613352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The impact of surgical guidelines and periodic quality assessment on the staging of endometrial cancer.
Bakkum-Gamez JN; Mariani A; Dowdy SC; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Cliby WA; Gostout BS; Stanhope CR; Wilson TO; Podratz KC
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Oct; 123(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 21741696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: Analysis of surgical performance.
Holloway RW; Ahmad S; DeNardis SA; Peterson LB; Sultana N; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Finkler NJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Dec; 115(3):447-52. PubMed ID: 19765807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Microlaparoscopy: a further development of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer staging -- initial experience.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Siesto G; Zefiro F; Franchi M; Bolis P
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 19243814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of two minimally invasive approaches to endometrial cancer staging: a single-surgeon experience.
Frey MK; Lin JF; Stewart LE; Makaroun L; Panico VJ; Holcomb K
J Reprod Med; 2015; 60(3-4):127-34. PubMed ID: 25898475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Participation of the general gynecologist in surgical staging of endometrial cancer: analysis of cost and perioperative outcomes.
Hoekstra A; Singh DK; Garb M; Arekapudi S; Rademaker A; Lurain JR
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec; 103(3):897-901. PubMed ID: 16814370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection: analysis of the first 100 cases.
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 11520146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature.
Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F
Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotic vs open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative outcomes and pathological measures of early oncological efficacy.
Wang GJ; Barocas DA; Raman JD; Scherr DS
BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 17888044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Perioperative outcomes of total laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy versus total robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients: a multicentre study.
Fagotti A; Gagliardi ML; Fanfani F; Salerno MG; Ercoli A; D'Asta M; Tortorella L; Turco LC; Escobar P; Scambia G
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 125(3):552-5. PubMed ID: 22391483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer.
Coronado PJ; Herraiz MA; Magrina JF; Fasero M; Vidart JA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 22819573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Four-arm robotic lobectomy for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer.
Veronesi G; Galetta D; Maisonneuve P; Melfi F; Schmid RA; Borri A; Vannucci F; Spaggiari L
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Jul; 140(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 20038475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of robotics on the outcome of elderly patients with endometrial cancer.
Lavoue V; Zeng X; Lau S; Press JZ; Abitbol J; Gotlieb R; How J; Wang Y; Gotlieb WH
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jun; 133(3):556-62. PubMed ID: 24708920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
