197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22036595)
1. Analysis of clinical samples for early detection of classical swine fever during infection with low, moderate, and highly virulent strains in relation to the onset of clinical signs.
Donahue BC; Petrowski HM; Melkonian K; Ward GB; Mayr GA; Metwally S
J Virol Methods; 2012 Jan; 179(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 22036595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection and quantitative pathogenesis study of classical swine fever virus using a real time RT-PCR assay.
Ophuis RJ; Morrissy CJ; Boyle DB
J Virol Methods; 2006 Jan; 131(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 16139899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of classical swine fever vaccine virus in blood and tissue samples of pigs vaccinated either with a conventional C-strain vaccine or a modified live marker vaccine.
Koenig P; Hoffmann B; Depner KR; Reimann I; Teifke JP; Beer M
Vet Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 120(3-4):343-51. PubMed ID: 17147979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, virus isolation, and immunoperoxidase assays for detecting pigs infected with low, moderate, and high virulent strains of classical swine fever virus.
Handel K; Kehler H; Hills K; Pasick J
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2004 Mar; 16(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15053364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamics of virus excretion via different routes in pigs experimentally infected with classical swine fever virus strains of high, moderate or low virulence.
Weesendorp E; Stegeman A; Loeffen W
Vet Microbiol; 2009 Jan; 133(1-2):9-22. PubMed ID: 18635323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a multiplex real-time RT-PCR for quantitative and differential detection of wild-type viruses and C-strain vaccine of Classical swine fever virus.
Zhao JJ; Cheng D; Li N; Sun Y; Shi Z; Zhu QH; Tu C; Tong GZ; Qiu HJ
Vet Microbiol; 2008 Jan; 126(1-3):1-10. PubMed ID: 17658704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of low-virulent classical swine fever virus in blood of experimentally infected animals: comparison of different methods.
Kaden V; Steyer H; Strebelow G; Lange E; Hübert P; Steinhagen P
Acta Virol; 1999 Dec; 43(6):373-80. PubMed ID: 10825927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a real-time RT-PCR assay using minor groove binding probe for specific detection of Chinese wild-type classical swine fever virus.
Wen G; Zhang T; Yang J; Luo Q; Liao Y; Hu Z; Zhang R; Wang H; Ai D; Luo L; Song N; Shao H
J Virol Methods; 2011 Sep; 176(1-2):96-102. PubMed ID: 21723883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of tissue degradation on detection of infectious virus and viral RNA to diagnose classical swine fever virus.
Weesendorp E; Willems EM; Loeffen WL
Vet Microbiol; 2010 Mar; 141(3-4):275-81. PubMed ID: 19854005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and validation of a novel SYBR Green real-time RT-PCR assay for the detection of classical swine fever virus evaluated on different real-time PCR platforms.
Pérez LJ; Díaz de Arce H; Tarradas J; Rosell R; Perera CL; Muñoz M; Frías MT; Nuñez JI; Ganges L
J Virol Methods; 2011 Jun; 174(1-2):53-9. PubMed ID: 21458490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pathogenicity and kinetics of virus propagation in swine infected with the cytopathogenic classical swine fever virus containing defective interfering particles.
Aoki H; Ishikawa K; Sekiguchi H; Suzuki S; Fukusho A
Arch Virol; 2003 Feb; 148(2):297-310. PubMed ID: 12556994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mutation of E1 glycoprotein of classical swine fever virus affects viral virulence in swine.
Risatti GR; Holinka LG; Lu Z; Kutish GF; Tulman ER; French RA; Sur JH; Rock DL; Borca MV
Virology; 2005 Dec; 343(1):116-27. PubMed ID: 16168455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Classical swine fever: comparison of oronasal immunisation with CP7E2alf marker and C-strain vaccines in domestic pigs.
Tignon M; Kulcsár G; Haegeman A; Barna T; Fábián K; Lévai R; Van der Stede Y; Farsang A; Vrancken R; Belák K; Koenen F
Vet Microbiol; 2010 Apr; 142(1-2):59-68. PubMed ID: 19857935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analytical performance of several classical swine fever laboratory diagnostic techniques on live animals for detection of infection.
Dewulf J; Koenen F; Mintiens K; Denis P; Ribbens S; de Kruif A
J Virol Methods; 2004 Aug; 119(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 15158595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An RT-PCR assay for the specific detection of classical swine fever virus in clinical samples.
Díaz de Arce H; Nuñez JI; Ganges L; Barreras M; Frías MT; Sobrino F
Vet Res; 1998; 29(5):431-40. PubMed ID: 9779556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic evaluation of a real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay for detection of classical swine fever virus.
Risatti G; Holinka L; Lu Z; Kutish G; Callahan JD; Nelson WM; Brea Tió E; Borca MV
J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Jan; 43(1):468-71. PubMed ID: 15635018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of classical swine fever virus in aerosols originating from pigs infected with strains of high, moderate or low virulence.
Weesendorp E; Stegeman A; Loeffen WL
Vet Microbiol; 2009 Mar; 135(3-4):222-30. PubMed ID: 19013029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterisation of experimental infections of domestic pigs with genotype 2.1 and 3.3 isolates of classical swine fever virus.
Everett H; Salguero FJ; Graham SP; Haines F; Johns H; Clifford D; Nunez A; La Rocca SA; Parchariyanon S; Steinbach F; Drew T; Crooke H
Vet Microbiol; 2010 Apr; 142(1-2):26-33. PubMed ID: 19875252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of a highly sensitive real-time RT-PCR protocol for the detection of Classical swine fever virus independent of the 5' untranslated region.
Leifer I; Blome S; Beer M; Hoffmann B
J Virol Methods; 2011 Jan; 171(1):314-7. PubMed ID: 21111760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A one-step, gel-based RT-PCR assay with comparable performance to real-time RT-PCR for detection of classical swine fever virus.
Liu L; Widén F; Baule C; Belák S
J Virol Methods; 2007 Feb; 139(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 17123637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
