206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22037686)
1. Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use.
Nitsche J; Howell C; Howell T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):979-83. PubMed ID: 22037686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized trial comparing metallic and absorbable staples for closure of a Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean delivery.
Feese CA; Johnson S; Jones E; Lambers DS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 209(6):556.e1-5. PubMed ID: 23921089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
Rousseau JA; Girard K; Turcot-Lemay L; Thomas N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery.
Basha SL; Rochon ML; Quiñones JN; Coassolo KM; Rust OA; Smulian JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):285.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20816153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized, prospective study of total hip wound closure with resorbable subcuticular staples.
Fisher DA; Bengero LL; Clapp BC; Burgess M
Orthopedics; 2010 Sep; 33(9):665. PubMed ID: 20839703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques.
Schrufer-Poland TL; Ruiz MP; Kassar S; Tomassian C; Algren SD; Yeast JD
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():53-56. PubMed ID: 27632411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clay FS; Walsh CA; Walsh SR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 204(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 21195384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
Frishman GN; Schwartz T; Hogan JW
J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wound complications in joint arthroplasty: comparing traditional and modern methods of skin closure.
Patel RM; Cayo M; Patel A; Albarillo M; Puri L
Orthopedics; 2012 May; 35(5):e641-6. PubMed ID: 22588404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Renal transplant incision closure using new absorbable subcuticular staple device.
Tellis VA
Clin Transplant; 2007; 21(3):410-2. PubMed ID: 17488393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis.
Wang H; Hong S; Teng H; Qiao L; Yin H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3705-11. PubMed ID: 26785886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Placement of Absorbable Dermal Staples in Mammaplasty and Abdominoplasty: A 12-Month Prospective Study of 60 Patients.
Bron T; Zakine G
Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Apr; 36(4):459-68. PubMed ID: 26530478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section.
Sharma C; Verma A; Soni A; Thusoo M; Mahajan VK; Verma S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 24816689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
Mackeen AD; Schuster M; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture.
Zaki MN; Truong M; Pyra M; Kominiarek MA; Irwin T
J Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 36(10):819-22. PubMed ID: 27253895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):CD003577. PubMed ID: 23152219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An initial evaluation of subcuticular skin closure with absorbable intradermal pins.
Meinke AK
Conn Med; 1996 Apr; 60(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 8776122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
