These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22037686)

  • 21. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
    Tsujinaka T; Yamamoto K; Fujita J; Endo S; Kawada J; Nakahira S; Shimokawa T; Kobayashi S; Yamasaki M; Akamaru Y; Miyamoto A; Mizushima T; Shimizu J; Umeshita K; Ito T; Doki Y; Mori M;
    Lancet; 2013 Sep; 382(9898):1105-12. PubMed ID: 24075050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The use of absorbable staples for skin closure after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy.
    Watson FC; McMullan W; Jordan CJ; Egan P; Tuan J; Solano MA; Fizpatrick N
    Vet Surg; 2019 Jan; 48(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 30378125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of incision closures with subcuticular and percutaneous staples.
    Dresner HS; Hilger PA
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2009; 11(5):320-6. PubMed ID: 19797094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reduction of skin closure time without loss of healing quality: a multicenter prospective study in 100 patients comparing the use of Insorb absorbable staples with absorbable thread for dermal suture.
    Duteille F; Rouif M; Alfandari B; Andreoletti JB; Sinna R; Laurent B; Perrot P
    Surg Innov; 2013 Feb; 20(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 22589018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.
    Rodel RL; Gray KM; Quiner TE; Bodea Braescu A; Gerkin R; Perlow JH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A prospective randomised comparison of 2 skin closure techniques in primary total hip arthroplasty surgery.
    Rui M; Zheng X; Sun SS; Li CY; Zhang XC; Guo KJ; Zhao FC; Pang Y
    Hip Int; 2018 Jan; 28(1):101-105. PubMed ID: 29148019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs.
    Fick JL; Novo RE; Kirchhof N
    Am J Vet Res; 2005 Nov; 66(11):1975-84. PubMed ID: 16334959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Figueroa D; Jauk VC; Szychowski JM; Garner R; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Hauth J; Tita AT
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial.
    Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Gottardi A; Cherubino M; Uccella S; Valdatta L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 203(1):36.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20417924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Wound morbidity with staples compared with suture for cesarean skin closure by diabetic status.
    Fitzwater JL; Jauk VC; Figueroa D; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Tita AT
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 25567558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Adhesive strips versus subcuticular suture for mediansternotomy wound closure.
    Lazar HL; McCann J; Fitzgerald CA; Cabral HJ
    J Card Surg; 2011 Jul; 26(4):344-7. PubMed ID: 21554389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A revolutionary advance in skin closure compared to current methods.
    Piñeros-Fernandez A; Salopek LS; Rodeheaver PF; Drake DB; Edlich RF; Rodeheaver GT
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 16566742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Staples versus subcuticular suture for cesarean skin closure in obese women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Han D; Feng L; Xu L; Li C; Zhang Q
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct; 51(8):102420. PubMed ID: 35688324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Aesthetic comparison of wound closure techniques in a porcine model.
    Tritle NM; Haller JR; Gray SD
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Nov; 111(11 Pt 1):1949-51. PubMed ID: 11801975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy: comparing sutures with absorbable staples.
    Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Lipscomb GH; Ling FW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):415-8. PubMed ID: 1876376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of absorbable subcuticular staples, continuous subcuticular absorbable suture, and percutaneous metal skin staples on infection in contaminated wounds.
    Pineros-Fernandez A; Salopek LS; Rodeheaver PF; Rodeheaver G
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2012; 22(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 23428250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure?
    Cooper SM; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Tita ATN
    Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul; 36(9):981-984. PubMed ID: 30477032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
    Fleisher J; Khalifeh A; Pettker C; Berghella V; Dabbish N; Mackeen AD
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A prospective randomized trial of absorbable staple fixation of skin grafts for burn wound coverage.
    Best T; Lobay G; Moysa G; Tredget E
    J Trauma; 1995 Jun; 38(6):915-9. PubMed ID: 7602635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cost analysis of stapling versus suturing for skin closure.
    Orlinsky M; Goldberg RM; Chan L; Puertos A; Slajer HL
    Am J Emerg Med; 1995 Jan; 13(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 7832962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.