BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22037834)

  • 1. Field comparison of three inhalable samplers (IOM, PGP-GSP 3.5 and Button) for welding fumes.
    Zugasti A; Montes N; Rojo JM; Quintana MJ
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Feb; 14(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 22037834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.
    Görner P; Simon X; Wrobel R; Kauffer E; Witschger O
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 20147627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of portable XRF and ICP-OES analysis for lead on air filter samples from a lead ore concentrator mill and a lead-acid battery recycler.
    Harper M; Pacolay B; Hintz P; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Mar; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 16528423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A headset-mounted mini sampler for measuring exposure to welding aerosol in the breathing zone.
    Lidén G; Surakka J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar; 53(2):99-116. PubMed ID: 19196747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance study of personal inhalable aerosol samplers at ultra-low wind speeds.
    Sleeth DK; Vincent JH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):207-20. PubMed ID: 21985868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Air sampling methodology for asphalt fume in asphalt production and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities: total particulate sampler versus inhalable particulate sampler.
    Calzavara TS; Carter CM; Axten C
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 12746079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
    Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of personal direct-reading dust monitors for the measurement of airborne inhalable dust.
    Thorpe A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jan; 51(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 16799158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis for lead on air filters from different personal samplers used in a secondary lead smelter/solder manufacturer.
    Harper M; Pacolay B
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Jan; 8(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 16395471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sampling of high amounts of bioaerosols using a high-volume electrostatic field sampler.
    Madsen AM; Sharma AK
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Apr; 52(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 18326871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laboratory and field testing of sampling methods for inhalable and respirable dust.
    Linnainmaa M; Laitinen J; Leskinen A; Sippula O; Kalliokoski P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Jan; 5(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 18041642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance characteristics of the button personal inhalable aerosol sampler.
    Aizenberg V; Grinshpun SA; Willeke K; Smith J; Baron PA
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(3):398-404. PubMed ID: 10885891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A field comparison of inhalable and thoracic size selective sampling techniques.
    Davies HW; Teschke K; Demers PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):381-92. PubMed ID: 10518464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The performance of personal inhalable dust samplers in wood-products industry facilities.
    Tatum VL; Ray AE; Rovell-Rixx DC
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Jul; 16(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 11458924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis for lead on air filters from different personal samplers used in a bronze foundry.
    Harper M; Pacolay B; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2005 Jun; 7(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 15931420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Personal sampling for inhalable aerosol exposures of carbon black manufacturing industry workers.
    Kerr SM; Muranko HJ; Vincent JH
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Oct; 17(10):681-92. PubMed ID: 12363209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis of air filter samples from a scrap lead smelting operation.
    Harper M; Hallmark TS; Andrew ME; Bird AJ
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Oct; 6(10):819-26. PubMed ID: 15480496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combined scanning electron microscopy and image analysis to investigate airborne submicron particles: a comparison between personal samplers.
    Zamengo L; Barbiero N; Gregio M; Orrù G
    Chemosphere; 2009 Jul; 76(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 19398120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of human exposure to airborne fungi in agricultural confinements: personal inhalable sampling versus stationary sampling.
    Adhikari A; Reponen T; Lee SA; Grinshpun SA
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2004; 11(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 15627336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.