164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22037896)
1. Disability advocacy and reproductive choice: engaging with the expressivist objection.
Peterson M
J Genet Couns; 2012 Feb; 21(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 22037896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Disability, identity and the "expressivist objection".
Edwards SD
J Med Ethics; 2004 Aug; 30(4):418-20. PubMed ID: 15289542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Choices and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability equality.
Shakespeare T
Disabil Soc; 1998 Nov; 13(5):665-81. PubMed ID: 11660717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Does prenatal diagnosis morally require provision of selective abortion?
Buccafurni D; Chang PL
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):65-7. PubMed ID: 19998168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Female self-determination between feminist claims and 'voluntary' eugenics, between 'rights' and ethics.
Degener T
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 11650920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The expressivist objection to prenatal testing: the experiences of families living with genetic disease.
Boardman FK
Soc Sci Med; 2014 Apr; 107():18-25. PubMed ID: 24602967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Against selection of human life -- people with disabilities oppose genetic counselling.
Waldschmidt A
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 11653997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. 'You are inferior!' Revisiting the expressivist argument.
Hofmann B
Bioethics; 2017 Sep; 31(7):505-514. PubMed ID: 28614604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prenatal screening and its impact on persons with disabilities.
Kaplan D
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 36(3):605-12. PubMed ID: 8403607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feminist criticism of prenatal diagnosis: a response.
Wertz DC; Fletcher JC
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 36(3):541-67. PubMed ID: 8403604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamics of prenatal screening: new developments challenging the ethical framework.
Dondorp W; van Lith J
Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):ii-iv. PubMed ID: 25521974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Prenatal screening: an ethical agenda for the near future.
de Jong A; de Wert GM
Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 25521973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prenatal diagnosis as a tool and support for eugenics: myth or reality in contemporary French society?
Gaille M; Viot G
Med Health Care Philos; 2013 Feb; 16(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 22814726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When is the Promotion of Prenatal Testing for Selective Abortion Wrong?
Perez Gomez J
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2020; 30(1):71-109. PubMed ID: 32336693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproductive autonomy of women and girls under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
Ngwena CG
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Jan; 140(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 29034953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prenatal screening, reproductive choice, and public health.
Wilkinson S
Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 25521971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new ethical landscape of prenatal testing: individualizing choice to serve autonomy and promote public health: a radical proposal.
Munthe C
Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 25521972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproductive technology and disability: searching for the "rights" and "wrongs" in explanation.
Mosoff J
Dalhous Law J; 1993; 16():98-124. PubMed ID: 11659939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Mother matters: a fresh look at prenatal genetic testing.
Lippman A
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 11653996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Deciding against disability: does the use of reproductive genetic technologies express disvalue for people with disabilities?
Malek J
J Med Ethics; 2010 Apr; 36(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 20338932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
